Clinical Utility of Pleural Fluid Protein in Differentiating Tuberculous and Malignant Pleural Effusion in a Resource-Limited Setting

Authors

  • Bushra Arif Author
  • Sada Saeed Author
  • Hamid Nisar Khan Author
  • Sabeen Sajjad Author
  • Muhammad Mamoon Author
  • Fazal Mustan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Diagnostic accuracy; Malignant pleural effusion; Pleural effusion; Pleural fluid protein

Abstract

 Abstract

 

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of pleural fluid protein in differentiating tuberculous pleural effusion (TBPE) from malignant pleural effusion (MPE).

 

Methodology: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at the Department of Pulmonology, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from October 2020 to March 2021. A total of 109 patients aged 20–75 years with pleural effusion were enrolled through consecutive non-probability sampling. Patients with end-stage renal, hepatic, or cardiac failure, terminal illness, or psychiatric disorders were excluded. Pleural biopsy with histopathological examination was used as the reference standard for diagnosing TBPE or MPE. Pleural fluid total protein was measured and categorized as <5 g/dL or =5 g/dL. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.

 

Results: The mean age was 45.65 ± 15.34 years, with a near-equal gender distribution. Histopathology confirmed TBPE in 61 (56.0%) patients and MPE in 48 (44.0%). Pleural fluid protein levels =5 g/dL were observed in 46 (42.2%) patients, while 63 (57.8%) had levels <5 g/dL. Using a cutoff value of =5 g/dL, pleural fluid protein demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.97%, specificity of 72.92%, PPV of 79.37%, NPV of 76.09%, and diagnostic accuracy of 77.98% for identifying TBPE. Conclusion: Pleural fluid protein estimation shows acceptable diagnostic performance in differentiating TBPE from MPE and may serve as a useful adjunct in resource-limited settings. Although histopathology remains the gold standard, pleural

 

fluid protein measurement can support earlier clinical decision-making when interpreted with clinical and radiological findings 

References

1. Vakil E, Taghizadeh N, Tremblay A. The Global Burden of

Pleural Diseases. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2023

Aug;44(04):417–25. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1769614

2. Gayen S. Malignant Pleural Effusion: Presentation, Diagnosis,

and Management. Am J Med. 2022 Oct;135(10):1188–92.

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.04.017

3. McNally E, Ross C, Gleeson LE. The tuberculous pleural

effusion. Breathe. 2023 Dec;19(4):230143. doi:10.1183/

20734735.0143-2023

4. Mohan G, Bhide P, Agrawal A, Kaul V, Chaddha U. A practical

approach to pseudoexudative pleural effusions. Respir Med.

2023 Aug;214:107279. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107279

5. Abbas I, Satti SA, Imran M, Hussain M, Ali K, Raza H.

Diagnostic Yield of Pleuroscopy in Undiagnosed Pleural

Effusions. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2025 Apr 29;75(2):

338–43. doi:10.51253/pafmj.v75i2.11137

6. Botana Rial M, Pérez Pallarés J, Cases Viedma E, López

González FJ, Porcel JM, Rodríguez M, et al. Diagnosis and

Treatment of Pleural Effusion. Recommendations of the

Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Update

2022. Arch Bronconeumol. 2023 Jan;59(1):27–35. doi:10.1016/

j.arbres.2022.09.017

7. Zheng WQ, Hu ZD. Pleural fluid biochemical analysis: the

past, present and future. Clin Chem Lab Med CCLM. 2023

Apr 25;61(5):921–34. doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-0844

8. Kassirian S, Hinton SN, Cuninghame S, Chaudhary R,

Iansavitchene A, Amjadi K, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of

pleural fluid cytology in malignant pleural effusions: systematic

review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2023 Jan;78(1):32–40.

doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959

9. Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. The modern diagnosis and

management of pleural effusions. BMJ. 2015 Sep 8;h4520.

doi:10.1136/bmj.h4520

10. Zaki HA, Albaroudi B, Shaban EE, Shaban A, Elgassim M,

Almarri ND, et al. Advancement in pleura effusion diagnosis:

a systematic review and meta-analysis of point-of-care

ultrasound versus radiographic thoracic imaging. Ultrasound

J. 2024 Jan 23;16(1):3. doi:10.1186/s13089-023-00356-z

11. Santotoribio JD. Pleural fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis

and management of malignant pleural effusions: a clinical

review: Cancer biomarkers in pleural fluid: a clinical review.

Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2026 Apr 3;63(3):237–60. doi:10.1080/

10408363.2025.2559697

12. Kassirian S, Hinton SN, Cuninghame S, Chaudhary R,

Iansavitchene A, Amjadi K, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of

pleural fluid cytology in malignant pleural effusions: systematic

review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2023 Jan;78(1):32–40.

doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959

13. Zheng WQ, Porcel JM, Lee YCG, Hu ZD. Pleural fluid

biochemical analyses: a state-of-the-art review. Crit Rev Clin

Lab Sci. 2026 May 19;63(4):287–304. doi:10.1080/10408363.

2025.2577984

14. Vaithinathan P, G V, Wilson J. Significance of Pleural Fluid

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Pleural Fluid Protein as

Additional Biomarkers in Differentiating Tubercular Pleural

Effusions From Non-tubercular Effusions. Cureus. 2026 Apr

27. doi:10.7759/cureus.107817

15. Chan KKP, Lee YCG. Tuberculous pleuritis: clinical

presentations and diagnostic challenges. Curr Opin Pulm

Med. 2024 May;30(3):210–6. doi:10.1097/MCP.

0000000000001052

16. Lam WKJ, Chan KKP, Wang G, Lai CKC, Kang G, Chan C,

et al. Sequencing of Pleural Fluid and Plasma for Tuberculous

Pleuritis. NEJM Evid. 2026 Mar 24;5(4). doi:10.1056/

EVIDoa2500237

17. Gonnelli F, Hassan W, Bonifazi M, Pinelli V, Bedawi EO,

Porcel JM, et al. Malignant pleural effusion: current

understanding and therapeutic approach. Respir Res. 2024

Jan 19;25(1):47. doi:10.1186/s12931-024-02684-7

18. Bashour SI, Mankidy BJ, Lazarus DR. Update on the diagnosis

and management of malignant pleural effusions. Respir Med.

2022 May;196:106802. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106802

19. Kurmi R, Chaurasiya A, Jha S, Sah SK. A Study of Tuberculous

Pleural Effusion in Province 2, Southern Nepal. Med Phoenix.

2023 Dec 31;8(2):61–5. doi:10.3126/medphoenix.v8i2.61508

20. Li Y, Chen Z, Yang P, Duan H, He J, Gong L, et al.

Differentiating between tuberculous and non-tuberculous

pleural effusions using the pleural fluid ratio of 10× adenosine

deaminase/lactate dehydrogenase. J Thorac Dis. 2023

May;15(5):2627–35. doi:10.21037/jtd-23-383

21. A.Wahyu IL, Y. Dwiputra P. A Case of Tuberculous Peritonitis

Accompanied By Tuberculous Pleuritis. J Indones Sos Teknol.

2024 Apr 19;5(4):1400–7. doi:10.59141/jist.v5i4.1009

22. Raja NSR, Arthi A, Jereen V, Bennihin DLS, Venkatesan M.

Pleural Effusion: Diagnostic Approach in Resource-limited

Settings. Ann Afr Med. 2026 Jun 19. doi:10.4103/ aam.aam_

331_26

23. Zimba L, Gass S, Makasa MC, Haldeman MS. Predictive

Ability of Sonographic Characteristics Alone to Diagnose

Tuberculous Pleural Effusions in a Resource-Limited Setting:

A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study in Zambia. Trop Med Int Health.

2026 May 7;tmi.70143. doi:10.1111/tmi.70143

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Clinical Utility of Pleural Fluid Protein in Differentiating Tuberculous and Malignant Pleural Effusion in a Resource-Limited Setting. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(03), 680-685. https://doi.org/10.51985/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.