Comparison of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection by Using Vessel Sealing System versus Conventional Thread Ligation in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy for Carcinoma of Breast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51985/Keywords:
Axillary Lymph Node, Carcinoma, Conventional, Dissection, MastectomyAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of the traditional thread ligation technique against the vessel sealing system employed in axillary dissection for breast cancer, focusing on the average postoperative drain output and the mean duration until drain removal.
Study Design and Setting: This study was carried out at the Gujranwala Medical College/District Headquarters Hospital. A total of 120 patients were enrolled in this study following the inclusion criteria. A Non-probability consecutive sampling technique was used to divide patients into two groups.
Results: In this study the mean age and BMI in Group A were 52.78 ± 10.06 years and 26.88 ± 3.94 kg/m² respectively. Similarly, the mean age and BMI in Group B were 50.27 ± 11.77 years and 29.08 ± 4.12 kg/m², respectively. In this study the mean drain removal days in the conventional group were 5.05 ± 0.81 and in the ligasure group were 4.75 ± 0.77, with the p-value being as significant as 0.040. Similarly, the mean drain fluid in the conventional group was 640.33 ± 59.80 ml and in the ligasure group was 487.83 ± 27.38 ml, p-value < 0.01. The stratification of the age with respect to drain fluid showed significant differences for all age groups, i.e., p-value < 0.01 except for age group 18-28 years, p-value 0.371.
Conclusion: Axillary lymph node dissection utilising the results in a reduction in mean postoperative drain output and the average duration until drain removal compared to the traditional thread ligation technique.
References
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL,
Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022:
GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide
for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for
clinicians. 2024 May;74(3):229-63. https://doi.org/ 10.3322/
caac.21834
2. Zaheer S, Yasmeen F. Historical trends in breast cancer
presentation among women in Pakistan from join-point
regression analysis. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
2024 Jan;40(1Part-I):134. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7123
3. Gulzar F, Akhtar MS, Sadiq R, Bashir S, Jamil S, Baig SM.
Identifying the reasons for delayed presentation of Pakistani
breast cancer patients at a tertiary care hospital. Cancer
management and research. 2019 Jan 29:1087-96. doi:
10.2147/CMAR.S180388
4. Magnoni F, Galimberti V, Corso G, Intra M, Sacchini V,
Veronesi P. Axillary surgery in breast cancer: an updated
historical perspective. InSeminars in oncology 2020 Dec 1
(Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 341-352). WB Saunders. https://doi.org/
10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.09.001
5. Hanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, DeSnyder SM, Caudle AS,
Shaitelman SF, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with
breast cancer after breast conservation vs mastectomy and
reconstruction. JAMA surgery. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):e220631
6. Moussa HR, Elmahdy TM, Abdelhamid AF. Harmonic scalpel
versus electrocautery in axillary lymph-node dissection in
patients with breast cancer: a prospective randomized study.
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery. 2021 Oct 1;40(4):1180-6.
DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_185_21
7. Jamil T, Tarar JM, Nasir F, Zahid MM, Ali A. The Risks of
Early Complications from Level II Axillary Clearance in
Modified Radical Mastectomy: Level II Axillary Clearance
in Modified Radical Mastectomy. Pakistan Journal of Health
Sciences. 2024 Jul 31:120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54393/
pjhs.v5i07.1909
8. sistemului de sigilare vascularã U. The use of vessel sealing
system in axillary dissection; effect on seroma formation.
Chirurgia. 2014;109:620-5. (www.revistachirurgia.ro)
9. Cortadellas T, Córdoba O, Espinosa-Bravo M. Electrothermal
bipolar vessel sealing system in axillary dissection: a
prospective randomized clinical study. Int J Surg.
2011;9(8):636-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.002
10. Tomko S, Tetsku H, Maiko T. A randomized controlled study
comparing a vessel sealing system with a conventional
technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast
cancer. Springeplus. 2016;5(1):1004. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-
016-2710-7
11. Zafar S, Khan MA, Rafiq U, Mahmood N. Comparison Of
Axillary Drain Out Put In Conventional And Advancedcompressive Energy Source Like Ultrasonic Scalpel And Dissection
Of Axilla In Breast Cancer Surgery. Journal of Ayub Medical
College Abbottabad. 2021 Jun 29;33(3):431-6. doi:
10.1007/s12282-023-01460-7
12. Kazzam, M. E., & Ng, P. (2022). Postoperative seroma
management. PMID: 36256748
13. £ukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, Baj J, Sitarz R,
Stanis³awek A. Breast cancer—epidemiology, risk factors,
classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment
strategies—an updated review. Cancers. 2021 Aug
25;13(17):4287. PMCID: PMC8428369 PMID: 34503097
14. Di Sibio A, Abriata G, Forman D, Sierra MS. Female breast
cancer in Central and South America. Cancer Epidemiology.
2016 Sep 1;44:S110-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.
2016.08.010
15. Wienerroither V, Hammer R, Kornprat P, Schrem H, Wagner
D, Mischinger HJ, El-Shabrawi A. Use of vessel sealing
system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer
patients: a retrospective comparative study. BMC surgery.
2022 Dec 22;22(1):436. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-
01888-2
16. Shaukat A, Anjum MA. Comparison of axillary lymph node
dissection by using vessel sealing system vs conventional
thread ligation in patients undergoing modified radical
mastectomy for carcinoma of breast. Annals of Punjab Medical
College. 2020 Sep 30;14(3):254-8. DOI: 10.29054/APMC
/2020.925
17. Toda Y, Iwata S, Kobayashi E, Ogura K, Osaki S, Fukushima
S, et al. A vessel sealing system can help reduce the risk of
postoperative complications after tumour resection in the
medial thigh. Bone & Joint Open. 2023 Jun 12;4(6):442-6.
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.46.BJO-2023-0037
18. Hasan SA, Ahmed DT, Al-Tamimi Z. Comparative Study of
Bipolar Vessel Sealing Against Standard Suturing in Total
Abdominal Hysterectomy. Journal of Bioscience and Applied
Research. 2024 Sep 22;10(3):545-51. DOI:10.21608/jbaar.
2024.381073
19. Peng JM, Ansingkar KK, Landavazo BN, Shaikh AF, Rahimi
M. A comprehensive review of seroma formation, prevention,
and treatment approaches. Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases,
Innovations and Techniques. 2025 Oct 1;11(5):101879.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101879
20. Zia MI, Malik S, Anum S, Zahara FT, Anum Z. Comparison
of outcomes of system and conventional electrocautery in
patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast
cancer. The Professional Medical Journal. 2023 Jan
1;30(01):107-12. . https://doi.org/10. 29309/TPMJ/2023.
30.01.7236
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0