Evaluation of Learner Insights on Innovative Teaching Strategies in Integrated Modular Biochemistry Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51985/Keywords:
Biochemistry, Curriculum, Faculty, Medical Education, Instructional Methods, StudentsAbstract
Objective: To test new instructional strategies in the integrated modular Biochemistry curriculum based on learner behaviors, knowledge retention, and student-centered education.
Study Design and Setting: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted at the Department of Biochemistry, University Medical & Dental College, a constituent medical college of The University of Faisalabad, utilizing an integrated modular curriculum. Surveys were undertaken of undergraduate medical faculty members and students to explore their perceptions of innovative teaching strategies.
Methodology: A total of 352 respondents were invited, comprising 300 learners and 52 teachers. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire that measured perceptions of interactive sessions involving large groups of students, tutorials/SGDs, case-based learning, and flip classrooms. Pearson's Chi-square and likelihood ratio tests were used to test the association between variables.
Results: A total of 352 respondents participated. For the integrated modular curriculum, 47.3% of students agreed and 12% strongly agreed that it complemented their knowledge and promoted participation. Regarding tutorials/SGDs, 55% agreed and 15% strongly agreed that these sessions encouraged a student-centered approach. In case-based learning, 48% agreed and 16.3% strongly agreed that it was intellectually stimulating and challenging. For the flipped classroom, 37.7% agreed and 10.3% strongly agreed that it was a useful innovation, although a considerable proportion remained neutral Conclusion: Research indicates that interactive teaching methods in biochemistry are favorably received, enhance active learning, and are of value within integrated curricula. A wider application can improve the performance of medical education.
References
1. Bickenbach J, Rubinelli S, Baffone C, Stucki G. The human
functioning revolution: implications for health systems and
sciences. Frontiers in Science. 2023 May 31;1:1118512. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2023.1118512
2. Gupta S, Sathe S, Arya K, Mitra B, Mangeshkar A. Evaluation
of an Integrated Teaching Approach in Physiology, Anatomy,
and Biochemistry for Phase I MBBS Students Using the
Kirkpatrick Model. Cureus. 2025 Jul 28;17(7). DOI: https://
doi.org/10.7759/cureus.88879
3. Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA. The Kirkpatrick
model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. Journal
of Intellectual and Developmental Disability. 2009 Sep
1;34(3):266-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10 .1080/13668250
903093125
4. KULKARNI A, GoWdA V, RAo C, RAo MY. Multiple Case
Scenarios Based Integrated Teaching among First Year Medical
Students-A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Clinical &
Diagnostic Research. 2021 May 1;15(5). DOI: https://doi.org/
10.7860/JCDR/2021/48157.14818
5. Lord C, Charman T, Havdahl A, Carbone P, Anagnostou E,
Boyd B, Carr T, De Vries PJ, Dissanayake C, Divan G, Freitag
CM. The Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical
research in autism. The Lancet. 2022 Jan 15;399(10321):271-
334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01541-5
6. Boluk KA, Cavaliere CT, Higgins-Desbiolles F. A critical
framework for interrogating the United Nations Sustainable
Development Goals 2030 Agenda in tourism. Journal of
Sustainable Tourism. 2019 Jul 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/
09669582.2019.1619748
7. Adapting curriculum to bridge equity gaps [Internet]. 2021.
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/adapting-curriculumto-bridge-equity-gaps_6b49e118-en.html
8. Sarkar S, Sharma S, Raheja S. Implementation of blended
learning approach for improving anatomy lectures of phase
i MBBS students–learner satisfaction survey. Advances in
Medical Education and Practice. 2021 Apr 23:413-20. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S301634
9. Ragsdale JW, Berry A, Gibson JW, Herber-Valdez CR, Germain
LJ, Engle DL, representing the Program Evaluation Special
Interest Group of the Southern Group on Educational Affairs
(SGEA) within the Association of American Medical Colleges
(AAMC). Evaluating the effectiveness of undergraduate
clinical education programs. Medical education online. 2020
Jan 1;25(1):1757883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/
10872981.2020.1757883
10. Johnson SB, Fair MA, Howley LD, Prunuske J, Cashman
SB, Carney JK, Jarris YS, Deyton LR, Blumenthal D, Krane
NK, Fiebach NH. Teaching public and population health in
medical education: an evaluation framework. Academic
Medicine. 2020 Dec 1;95(12):1853-63. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003737
11. Experts EP. NTA UGC NET/JRF Management Book 2024
(Paper I and II) | 10 Full Length Mock Tests and 2 Previous
Year Papers (1800 Solved Questions) with Free Access to
Online Tests. EduGorilla Community Pvt. Ltd.;
2024.https://www.amazon.com/Management-TeachingResearch-Full-length-EduGorilla-ebook/dp/B091VYJZSB
12. Loeng S. Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult
education. Education Research International.
2020;2020(1):3816132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155
/2020/3816132
13. Hallsworth JE, Udaondo Z, Pedrós-Alió C, Höfer J, Benison
KC, Lloyd KG, Cordero RJ, de Campos CB, Yakimov MM,
Amils R. Scientific novelty beyond the experiment. Microbial
Biotechnology. 2023 Jun;16(6):1131-73. DOI: https://
doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14222
14. Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M.
Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19
crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity.
Postdigital science and education. 2020 Oct;2(3):923-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
15. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Slade EL, Jeyaraj A, Kar
AK, Baabdullah AM, Koohang A, Raghavan V, Ahuja M,
Albanna H. Opinion Paper:“So what if ChatGPT wrote it?”
Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges
and implications of generative conversational AI for research,
practice and policy. International journal of information
management. 2023 Aug 1;71:102642.. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
16. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KI, Harrell FE, Martin GP, Reitsma
JB, Moons KG, Collins G, Van Smeden M. Calculating the
sample size required for developing a clinical prediction
model. Bmj. 2020 Mar 18; 368. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1136/
bmj.m441
17. Ferreira LN, Pereira LN, da Fé Brás M, Ilchuk K. Quality of
life under the COVID-19 quarantine. Quality of Life Research.
2021 May;30(5):1389-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007
/s11136-020-02724-x
18. Chen Y, Ding W, Xu Y, Li S, Zhang W. Exploratory application
of an integrated topic-based curriculum in biochemistry
experimental teaching. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Education. 2022 Nov;50(6):561-70. DOI: https://doi.org
/10.1002/bmb.21564
19. Debnath S, Thakur KK, Balowria KS. Two-way feedback
between the students and faculty to improve the methods and
style of teaching anatomy to undergraduate medical students.
Int J Anat Res [Internet]. 2020;8(4.1):7749-52. DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2020.157
20. Arshad M, Mahmood S, Abid M, Baloch MF, Mansoor M,
Butt ZP. Perception of Medical Students and Faculty Regarding
Integrated Curriculum in A Medical Institute.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51273/esc25.251321131
21. Bening SA, Dachyar M, Pratama NR, Park J, Chang Y. ECommerce technologies adoption strategy selection in
Indonesian SMEs using the decision-makers, technological,
organizational and environmental (DTOE) framework.
Sustainability. 2023 Jun 9;15(12): 9361. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129361
22. Cvetkoviæ D, editor. Drones-Various Applications. BoD–Books
on Demand; 2024 Feb 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/
intechopen.1000551
23. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Rana NP, Baabdullah
AM, Kar AK, Koohang A, Ribeiro-Navarrete S, Belei N,
Balakrishnan J, Basu S. Exploring the darkverse: A multiperspective analysis of the negative societal impacts of the
metaverse. Information systems frontiers. 2023 Oct;25(5):2071-
114.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10400-x
24. Ten Cate O, Custers EJ, Durning SJ. Principles and practice
of case-based clinical reasoning education: a method for
preclinical students. https://library.oapen.org/
bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/27745/1/1002260.pdf
25. Matsushita K. Deep Active Learning: Toward Greater Depth
in University Education. Springer; 2019.https://www.
academia.edu/81782071/Deep_Active_Learning
26. Yu T, Dai J, Wang C. Adoption of blended learning: Chinese
university students’ perspectives. Humanities and Social
Sciences Communications. 2023 Jul 8;10(1):1-6. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01904-7
27. Fidan M. The effects of microlearning-supported flipped
classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning performance,
motivation and engagement. Education and Information
Technologies. 2023 Oct;28(10):12687-714. DOI:
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
