Correlation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) and histopathology. A single-center Observational Study

Authors

  • Wizra Faiz Author
  • Sarfraz Latif Author
  • Zia us Salam Qazi Author
  • Maham Malik Author
  • Shehryar Haider Author
  • Humna Usman Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Thyroid Nodule; Ultrasonography; Thyroid Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Diagnostic Imaging

Abstract

 Objective: To correlate TIRADS with the final histopathology in patients undergoing thyroid surgery.

 

Study design & settings: prospective observational study at Department of ENT, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Methodology: We included 142 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent ACR TI-RADS-reported neck ultrasonography at our center followed by thyroid surgery. Histopathology was the reference standard. For diagnostic testing, TI-RADS 1- 3 were prespecified as test negative and TI-RADS 4-5 as test positive. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were calculated.

 

Results: The largest age group was 30-39 years (42/142; 29.6%). There were 120 females and 22 males (female:male ratio approximately 5.5:1). TI-RADS distribution was TR1 3, TR2 23, TR3 62, TR4 48, and TR5 6. Histopathology showed 88 benign (62.0%) and 54 malignant (38.0%) nodules. Using TI-RADS 1-3 as test negative and TI-RADS 4-5 as test positive, sensitivity was 64.8%, specificity 78.4%, PPV 64.8%, NPV 78.4%, and diagnostic accuracy 73.2%. ROC analysis showed AUC 0.726 (95% CI 0.637-0.816; p<0.01), indicating approximately 72.6% discriminatory ability.

 

Conclusion: ACR TI-RADS showed a significant association with histopathology in this surgically selected tertiary-care cohort. Diagnostic performance was moderate, and the observed malignancy frequencies were not strictly monotonic across all categories. These findings should not be generalized to unselected thyroid-nodule populations without qualification 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mu C, Ming X, Tian Y, Liu Y, Yao M, Ni Y, et al. Mapping

global epidemiology of thyroid nodules among general

population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front

Oncol. 2022;12:1029926. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1029926.

2. Thattarakkal VR, Ahmed TSF, Saravanam PK, Murali S.

Evaluation of thyroid nodule: Thyroid Imaging Reporting

and Data System (TIRADS) and clinicopathological

correlation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.

2022;74(Suppl 3):5850-5855. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02461-

8.

3. Grani G, Sponziello M, Filetti S, Durante C. Thyroid nodules:

diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Endocrinol.

2024;20(12):715-728. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-01025-4.

4. Angelopoulos N, Goulis DG, Chrisogonidis I, Livadas S,

Paparodis R, Androulakis I, et al. Diagnostic performance of

European and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging

Reporting and Data System classification systems in thyroid

nodules over 20 mm in diameter. Endocr Pract. 2025;31(1):72-

79. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.10.004.

5. Koelliker EL, Krumeich LN, Kravchenko T, Keamy Blanco

MM, Letica-Kriegel AS, Hsu I, et al. Sonographic and

pathologic features of malignant hot thyroid nodules: a multiinstitutional study. Surgery. 2026;189:109710. doi:

10.1016/j.surg.2025.109710.

6. Anwar K, Mohammad AY, Khan S. The sensitivity of TIRADS

scoring on ultrasonography in the management of thyroid

nodules. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(3):870-874. doi:

10.12669/pjms.39.3.7313.

7. Yang L, Li C, Chen Z, He S, Wang Z, Liu J. Diagnostic

efficiency among EU-, C-, and ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect

for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1227339.

doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1227339.

8. Singaporewalla RM, Hwee J, Lang TU, Desai V. Clinicopathological correlation of thyroid nodule ultrasound and

cytology using the TIRADS and Bethesda classifications.

World J Surg. 2017;41(7):1807-1811. doi: 10.1007/s00268-

017-3919-5.

9. Wilkinson T, Cawood T, Lim A, Roche D, Jiang J, Thomson

B, et al. Correlation of ACR TI-RADS and patient outcomes

in a real-world cohort presenting for thyroid ultrasonography.

J Endocr Soc. 2023;7(10):bvad119. doi: 10.1210/jendso

/bvad119.

10. Huang EYF, Kao NH, Lin SY, Jang IJH, Kiong KL, See A,

et al. Concordance of the ACR TI-RADS classification with

Bethesda scoring and histopathology risk stratification of

thyroid nodules. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(9):e2331612.

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31612.

11. Rajyakodi K, Balasubramanian A, Sundaram S, Gnanavel H.

Clinicopathological and radiological correlation among the

spectrum of nodular thyroid lesions. Cureus. 2024;16(10):

e70725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70725.

12. Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, Franco C, Niedmann JP, Castro

A, et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules

stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin

Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(5):1748-1751. doi: 10.1210/jc.

2008-1724.

13. Zhang X, Esebua M, Layfield L. American College of

Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting System and

cytopathologic classification: integration for improved

assessment of malignancy risk. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2026;

15(1):73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2025.08.001.

14. Ahmed MOK, Ce A, Gareeballah A, Arafat M, Al Ali A, Odeh

KA, et al. Assessment of thyroid nodules using TIRADS

classification: interobserver agreement and correlation with

histopathology. Int J Biomed. 2022;12(3):385-390. doi:

10.21103/Article12(3)_OA6.

15. García-Moncó Fernández C, Serrano-Moreno C, DonnayCandil S, Carrero-Alvaro J. A correlation study between

histological results and thyroid ultrasound findings: the TIRADS classification. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed).

2018;65(4):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2018.04.004.

16. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland

LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and

Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS

Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587-595. doi:

10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046.

17. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland

MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of thyroid

nodule risk stratification using the American College of

Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. AJR

Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(6):1331-1341. doi: 10.2214/AJR.

16.17613.

18. Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Son EJ, Park SH, et

al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features

of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer

risk. Radiology. 2011;260(3):892-899. doi: 10.1148/radiol.

11110206.

19. Periakaruppan G, Seshadri KG, Vignesh Krishna GM, Mandava

R, Sai VPM, Rajendiran S. Correlation between ultrasoundbased TIRADS and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid

Cytopathology: 2-year experience at a tertiary care center in

India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;22(5):651-655. doi:

10.4103/ijem.IJEM_27_18.

20. George NA, Suresh S, Jiji V, Renu S, Thomas S, Janardhan

D, et al. Correlation of TIRADS and Bethesda scoring systems

with final histopathology of thyroid nodules: an institutional

experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.

2022;74(Suppl 3):5753-5758. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02380-

8.

21. Horvath E, Silva CF, Majlis S, Rodriguez I, Skoknic V, Castro

A, et al. Prospective validation of the ultrasound-based

TIRADS classification: results in surgically resected thyroid

nodules. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(6):2619-2628. doi: 10.1007/

s00330-016-4605-y.

22. Chandramohan A, Khurana A, Pushpa BT, Manipadam MT,

Naik D, Thomas N, et al. Is TIRADS a practical and accurate

system for use in daily clinical practice? Indian J Radiol

Imaging. 2016;26(1):145-152. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.178367.

23. Park JY, Lee HJ, Jang HW, Kim HK, Yi JH, Lee W, et al. A

proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for

ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid.

2009;19(11):1257-1264. doi: 10.1089/thy.2008.0021.

24. Srinivas MN, Amogh VN, Gautam MS, Prathyusha IS, Vikram

NR, Retnam MK, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the

reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in

differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid lesions.

J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016;6:5. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.177551.

25. Moifo B, Takoeta EO, Tambe J, Blanc F, Fotsin JG. Reliability

of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System classification

in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules.

Open J Radiol. 2013;3(3):103-107. doi: 10.4236/ojrad. 2013.

33016.

26. Barbosa TLM, Junior COM, Graf H, Cavalvanti T, Trippia

MA, da Silveira Ugino RT, et al. ACR TI-RADS and ATA

ultrasound scores are helpful for the management of thyroid

nodules with indeterminate cytology. BMC Endocr Disord.

2019;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0429-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Correlation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) and histopathology. A single-center Observational Study. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(04), 1044-1050. https://doi.org/10.51985/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 84

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)