Antibacterial Activity of Sesamol against Methicillin-Sensitive and MethicillinResistant Staphylococcus aureus: An in Vitro Comparative Study

Authors

  • Sabra Siraj Author
  • Kauser Ismail Author
  • Ambrina Khatoon Author
  • Hafiz Syed Muhammad Osama Jafri Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Broth Microdilution, MIC, MRSA, MSSA, Sesamol, Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract

 Objective: To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of sesamol against Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), through the broth microdilution method.

 

Study Design and Setting: In vitro experimental study, conducted at the Microbiology Laboratory, Ziauddin University Hospital (North Nazimabad Campus), Multi-Disciplinary Research Lab, Ziauddin University Clifton Campus, Karachi, from 1st September 2025 to 28th December 2025.

 

Methodology: Sesamol (purity = 98%) was dissolved in 50% DMSO to obtain a 200 mg/mL stock solution. The antibacterial activity was evaluated using the Broth Microdilution Assay with several two-fold serial dilutions of sesamol against both drug-sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. The difference in MIC between the two groups was statistically processed by a Mann–Whitney U test.

 

Results: Sesamol showed concentration-dependent antibacterial inhibitory actions against all the MSSA and MRSA strains tested. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of sesamol for MSSA and MRSA was 1.5 mg/mL and 2.0 mg/mL, respectively. The difference in MIC between the two groups was found to be statistically non-significant(p=0.41) between the two groups

 

Conclusion: Sesamol showed concentration-dependent antibacterial activity, though the difference between MSSA and MRSA was not statistically significant (p=0.41). Its MIC against MSSA and MRSA indicates possible antimicrobial activity against these pathogens and warrants further investigation. These results suggest that sesamol can be a potential natural antibacterial agent that may proceed for further pre-clinical studies 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Wang J, Long S, Liu Z, Rakesh KP, Verma R, Verma SK, et

al. Structure-activity relationship studies of thiazole agents

with potential anti methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus

aureus (MRSA) activity. 2023;132:13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/

10.1016/j.procbio.2023.06.013

2. Rice LBJTJoid. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial

resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. The

University of Chicago Press; 2008. p. 1079-81. DOI: https://doi.

org/10.1086/533452

3. Ali A, Riaz SJI, Genetics, Evolution. Emerging threats of

high biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in clinical

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates

from Pakistan. 2024;121:105592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.

1016/j.meegid.2024.105592

4. Tajbakhsh E, Shamakhte F, Abbasi Montazeri EJC, Molecular,

Reports B. Prevalence of linezolid antibiotic resistance in

MRSA strains isolated from hospitalized children clinical

samples. 2025;5(1):28-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55705/

cmbr.2025.457620.1247

5. Xing A, Ng HM, Jiao H, Li K, Ye QJM. The prevalence,

epidemiological, and molecular characterization of methicillinResistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Macau

(2017–2022). 2024;12(1):148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/

microorganisms12010148

6. Khatoon A, Hussain SF, Shahid SM, Sidhwani SK, Khan SA,

Shaikh OA, et al. Emerging novel sequence types of

Staphylococcus aureus in Pakistan. 2024;17(1):51-9. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.10.036

7. Idrees MM, Saeed K, Shahid MA, Akhtar M, Qammar K,

Hassan J, et al. Prevalence of mecA-and mecC-associated

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical

specimens, Punjab, Pakistan. 2023;11(3):878. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030878

8. Maddiboyina B, Roy H, Ramaiah M, Sarvesh C, Kosuru SH,

Nakkala RK, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:

novel treatment approach breakthroughs. 2023;47(1):95. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01072-3

9. Liu W-T, Chen E-Z, Yang L, Peng C, Wang Q, Xu Z, et al.

Emerging resistance mechanisms for 4 types of common antiMRSA antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus: A comprehensive

review. 2021;156:104915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.micpath.2021.104915

10. Nair AB, Dalal P, Kadian V, Kumar S, Kapoor A, Garg M, et

al. Formulation, characterization, anti-inflammatory and

cytotoxicity study of sesamol-laden nanosponges.

2022;12(23):4211. DOI; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234211

11. Lobiuc A, Pavãl N-E, Mangalagiu II, Gheorghi?ã R, Teliban

G-C, Amãriucãi-Mantu D, et al. Future antimicrobials: Natural

and functionalized phenolics. 2023;28(3):1114. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031114

12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for

dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that

grow aerobically. 11 ed. Wayne, PA2018.

13. Ghayyib AA, Ahmed IA, Ahmed HKJHN. Isolation, molecular

identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of

Staphylococcus aureus isolates. 2022;22(2):278-83. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31838/hiv22.02.56

14. Demir T, Coplu N, Esen BJIJoP, Microbiology. Comparative

analysis of phenotypic and genotypic detection of methicillin

resistance among Staphylococcus aureus. 2016;59(3):314-7.

DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.188103 DOI: 10.4103/0377-

4929.188103

15. Li Z, Wu M, Yan H, Meng Z, Gao B, Dong QJF. Antibacterial

effect and possible mechanism of sesamol against foodborne

pathogens. 2024;13(3):435. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 3390/

foods13030435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ foods13030435

16. Mahendra Kumar C, Singh SAJJofs, technology. Bioactive

lignans from sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): evaluation of

their antioxidant and antibacterial effects for food applications.

2015;52(5):2934-41. DOI 10.1007/s13197-014-1334-6

17. Yan H, Wu M, Gao B, Bu X, Dong Q, Hirata T, et al. Inhibition

and eradication of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm using the

combined treatment with nisin and sesamol. 2024;198:116015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116015

18. Ji P, Yin K, Jiang Y, Sun Y, Luo W, Zhou JJFS, et al. Sesamol:

a novel quorum sensing inhibitor and colistin accelerator

against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2025;14(3):9250075. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26599/FSHW.2024.9250075

19. Miller WR, Arias CAJNRM. ESKAPE pathogens:

antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, clinical impact and

therapeutics. 2024;22(10):598-616. DOI: https://doi.org/

10.1038/ s41579-024-01054-w

20. Yang R, Cheng W, Huang M, Xu T, Zhang M, Liu J, et al.

Novel membrane-targeting isoxanthohumol-amine conjugates

for combating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

(MRSA) infections. 2024;268:116274. DOI: https://doi.org/

10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116274

21. Wu M, Dong Q, Song X, Xu L, Xia X, Aslam MZ, et al.

Effective combination of nisin and sesamol against Listeria

monocytogenes. 2023;176:114546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.

1016/j.lwt.2023.114546

22. Tabassum S, Hafeez J, Sami A, Saleem I, Karamat M, Hussain

FJPJoS. Comparative Assessment Of Biological Activities

Of Sesamum Indicum And Sesamum Radiatum Extracts And

Chemical Characterization. 2025;77(1):151-7. DOI:

10.57041/vol77iss01pp151-157

23. Ateshan HM. Evaluation of Phytochemical and Antibacterial

properties of Sesame seeds (Sesamum indicum L.). DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.33545/2664844X.2025.v7.i10h.922

24. Yenn TW, Hashim M, Farzana NF, Saa LL, Ring LC, WenNee TJMJoM, et al. Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities

of Ghee Hiang Sesame Oil Extract. 2023;19. DOI:10.47836/

mjmhs.19.s9.11

25. Bachvarova M, Stremski Y, Kirkova D, Statkova-Abeghe S,

Docheva MJA. Synthesis of Novel Sesamol-Based Hybrids—

In Silico Analysis and In Vitro Evaluation of Radical

Scavenging Activity. 2026;6(2):21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.

3390/appliedchem6020021

26. Nair AB, Dalal P, Kadian V, Kumar S, Garg M, Rao R, et al.

Formulation strategies for enhancing pharmaceutical and

nutraceutical potential of sesamol: A natural phenolic bioactive.

2023;12(5):1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051168

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Antibacterial Activity of Sesamol against Methicillin-Sensitive and MethicillinResistant Staphylococcus aureus: An in Vitro Comparative Study. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(04), 900-907. https://doi.org/10.51985/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.