Comparison of Foveal Avascular Zone Parameters in Diabetic Retinopathy and Normal Retina on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Using Automated Software

Authors

  • Summaiya Munim Author
  • Faisal Aziz Khan Author
  • Muhammad Kashif Hanif Author
  • Quratulain Paracha Author
  • Beenish Saleem Author
  • Sameer Shahid Ameen Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Angiography, Diabetic retinopathy, Optical coherence tomography

Abstract

 Objective: To compare Foveal Avascular Zone (FAZ) metrics comprising of FAZ area, perimeter and circularity between individuals afflicted with diabetic retinopathy and those exhibiting healthy, normal retinal profile by using built in algorithm of Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A)

 

Study Design and Setting: It was an observational study. Conducted at the Ophthalmology Department, PNS Shifa Hospital, Karachi from October 2023 to December 2024.

 

Methodology: 60 patients participated which included 30 type 2 diabetics with mild to moderate non proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), without macular involvement and 30 non diabetics age matched normals. FAZ parameters of OCTAngio Optopol revo nx130 (Area, Circularity and Perimeter) were calculated and compared between two groups using automated built in software. FAZ parameters of mild and moderate NPDR were compared within diabetic group.

 

Results: Mean age in diabetics was 55.33 ± 6.85 years and in non-diabetics 55.30± 4.94 years. On comparison of FAZ parameters the area and perimeter were statistically significantly enlarged as compared to non-diabetics FAZ parameters (p < 0.001). The circularity index was lower among diabetics as compared to non-diabetics (p < 0.001). Among the diabetic patients there was a statistically significant enlargement of FAZ area in moderate NPDR versus mild NPDR (p <0.001) and difference of FAZ perimeter (p = 0.07) and circularity index (p =0.60) were statistically insignificant.

 

Conclusion: Diabetic patients with mild to moderate NPDR having clinically normal appearing maculae show deranged FAZ parameters on OCT-A as compared to age matched normal healthy retinae 

References

1. Peng X, Peng Y, Li L, Liu L, Zhou G, Cai Y. Breakthroughs

in diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and treatment using preclinical

research models: current progress and future directions. Ann

Med. 2025 ;57(1):2531251. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.

2531251. Epub 2025 Jul 13.

2. Aitchison RT, Kennedy GJ, Shu X, et al. Measuring the foveal

avascular zone in diabetes: A study using optical coherence

tomography angiography. J. Diabetes Investig.2022;13(4):668-

76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13712

3. Sijilmassi O. Quantitative Analysis of Different Foveal

Avascular Zone Metrics in Healthy and Diabetic Subjects.

Diabetology. 2024;5(3):246-54.https://doi.org/10.3390/

diabetology5030019

4. Koksaldi S, Kayabasi M, Karti O, Saatci AO. Clinical anatomy

of the macula. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol.

2025;14(2):17-27. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1520.

5. Kashani AH, Lee SY, Moshfeghi A, et al. Optical coherence

tomography angiography of retinal venous occlusion. Retina.

2015;35(11):2323-31. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000811.

6. Takase N, Nozaki M, Kato A, et al. Enlargement of foveal

avascular zone in diabetic eyes evaluated by en face optical

coherence tomography angiography.Retina.2015;35(11):2377-

83.doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000849

7. Coffey AM, Hutton EK, Combe L, et al. Optical coherence

tomography angiography in primary eye care. Clin Exp Optom.

2021;104(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13068.

8. Baddam DO, Ragi SD, Tsang SH, et al. Ophthalmic Fluorescein

Angiography. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2560:153-60. doi:

10.1007/978-1-0716-2651-1_159. Ha SO, Kim DY, Sohn CH, Lim KS. Anaphylaxis caused by

intravenous fluorescein: clinical characteristics and review

of literature. Intern Emerg Med. 2014;9(3):325-30. doi:

10.1007/s11739-013-1019-6.

10. Hagag AM, Gao SS, Jia Y, Huang D. Optical coherence

tomography angiography: Technical principles and clinical

applications in ophthalmology. Taiwan J Ophthalmol.

2017;7(3):115-29. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_31_17.

11. Pamulapati P, Das MK, Mohanty G. Assessing preclinical

diabetic retinopathy: The Role of Optical Coherence

Tomography Angiography.Cureus.2024;16(10):e72747.doi:

10.7759/cureus.72747.

12. Oliverio GW, Meduri A, De Salvo G, et al. OCT Angiography

Features in Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 and 2. Diagnostics

(Basel).2022;12(12):2942.doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122942.

13. Dan AO, ?tefãnescu-Dima A, Bãlã?oiu AT, et al. Early Retinal

Microvascular Alterations in Young Type 1 Diabetic Patients

without Clinical Retinopathy. Diagnostics (Basel).2023;13(9)

:1648. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091648.

14. Yu G, Aaberg MT, Patel TP, et al. Quantification of retinal

nonperfusion and neovascularization with ultrawidefield

fluorescein angiography in patients with diabetes and associated

characteristics of advanced disease. JAMA Ophthalmol

.2020;138(6):680-88. doi: 10.1001/ jamaophthalmol

.2020.1257.

15. Shiihara H, Terasaki H, Sonoda S, et al. Objective evaluation

of size and shape of superficial foveal avascular zone in

normal subjects by optical coherence tomography angiography.

Sci Rep.2018;8(1):10143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28530-

7.

16. Krawitz BD, Mo S, Geyman LS, et al. Acircularity index

and axis ratio of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic eyes

and healthy controls measured by optical coherence

tomography angiography. Vision Res.2017;139:77-186. doi:

10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.019.

17. De Carlo TE, Chin AT, Bonini Filho MA, et al. Detection of

microvascular changes in eyes of patients with diabetes but

not clinical diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence

tomography angiography. Retina.2015;35(11):2364-

70.doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000882.

18. Courtie E, Kirkpatrick JRM, Taylor M, et al. Optical coherence

tomography angiography analysis methods: a systematic

review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep.2024;14(1):9643. doi:

10.1038/s41598-024-54306-3.

19. Bates NM, Tian J, Smiddy WE, et al. Relationship between

the morphology of the foveal avascular zone, retinal structure,

and macular circulation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Sci

Rep. 2018;8(1):5355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23604-y.

20. Kim K, Kim ES, Yu SY. Optical coherence tomography

angiography analysis of foveal microvascular changes and

inner retinal layer thinning in patients with diabetes. Br J

Ophthalmol. 2018;102(9):1226-31. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-

2017-311149.

21. Conrath J, Giorgi R, Ridings B, Raccah D. Metabolic factors

and the foveal avascular zone of the retina in diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes Metab.2005;31(5):465-70. doi: 10.1016/s1262-

3636(07)70217-3.

22. Acosta CP, González D, Sardi C, et al. Measurement and

evaluation of the foveal avascular zone in a healthy Latino

population. Retina Today.2021;(-):20-4.

23. Hogg RE, Wright DM, Dolz-Marco R, et al. Quantitative

Parameters from OCT Angiography in Patients with Diabetic

Retinopathy and in Those with Only Peripheral Retinopathy

Compared with Control Participants. Ophthalmol Sci.

2021;1(2):100030. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100030.

24. Duffy BV, Castellanos-Canales D, Decker NL, et al. Foveal

Avascular Zone Enlargement Correlates with Visual Acuity

Decline in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmol

Retina.2025;9(7):667-76. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.12.015.

25. Tang FY, Ng DS, Lam A, et al. Determinants of Quantitative

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics in

Patients with Diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2575. doi:

10.1038/s41598-017-02767-0

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Comparison of Foveal Avascular Zone Parameters in Diabetic Retinopathy and Normal Retina on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Using Automated Software. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(02), 483-488. https://doi.org/10.51985/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.