Learning Curve and Early Outcomes of Robotic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the First 150 Cases at a Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51985/Keywords:
Cholecystectomy; Learning curve; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Procedure, Robotic SurgicalAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy using the CMR Versius system and to characterize operative performance during the initial institutional experience.
Study design and setting: This retrospective cohort study took place at Surgical Unit 4, Ward 21, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan
Methodology: This retrospective analysis was conducted on the first 150 consecutive robotic cholecystectomy cases. These cases were performed by a trained surgeon between January 2024 and January 2026. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database.
Results: Out of 150 planned procedures, the majority (n=130 robotic-assisted cholecystectomies + 6 converted to Laparoscopic and 9 combined with other procedures) were completed robotically. No bile injury was noted. The mean console time was 26 minutes. The mean setup time recorded was 15 minutes. Three cases were converted to open surgery due to complex pathology (empyema, fistula). There were two procedures in patients with advanced chronic liver disease and ascites that were abandoned. Postoperative pain reported by patients was minimal, with 82.7% patients reporting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 0 on postoperative day 1. Sequential operative-time analysis demonstrated improvement during the early cases followed by relative stabilization later in the series.
Conclusion: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy using the Versius platform proved to be a safe and feasible option, even in anticipated difficult cases with minimal learning curve.
Downloads
References
1. Kelkar DS, Kurlekar U, Stevens L, Wagholikar GD, Slack
M. An early prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety
and performance of the Versius surgical system in robotassisted cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2023 Jan;277(1):9–17.
doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005410
2. Reinisch A, Liese J, Padberg W, Ulrich F. Robotic operations
in urgent general surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg.
2023 Apr;17(2):275–290. doi:10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6.
3. Schmidgall S, Opfermann JD, Kim JW, Krieger A. Will your
next surgeon be a robot? Autonomy and AI in robotic surgery.
Sci Robot. 2025 Jul 23;10(104):eadt0187. doi:10.1126/
scirobotics.adt0187.
4. Stefanishina V, Remersu SB, Elliott S, Sreekanth F, Fazylov
R, Pollack S, Gadangi PK, McIntyre T, Ghirardo S, Kallakuri
S, Muthusamy M. Comparative outcomes of robotic assisted
versus laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a retrospective
analysis of surgical efficacy and postoperative intervention.
JSLS. 2025 Jan–Mar;29(1):e2024.00058. doi:10.4293/ JSLS.
2024.00058.
5. Huy TC, Fitzsimmons K, Park J, Sawicki M, Sebastian JL,
Tomlinson JS, Md MDG. The robotic era: 11-year retrospective
study of cholecystectomies at a veterans affairs hospital. Surg
Endosc. 2025 Nov;39(11):7476–7485. doi:10.1007/s00464-
025-12185-3.
6. Oner M. Preliminary comparative outcomes of Versius robotic
system-assisted cholecystectomy and laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for benign gall bladder disease: retrospective
single-centre, single-surgeon analysis. J Minim Access Surg.
2025 Oct 1;21(4):378–384. doi:10.4103/jmas.jmas_13_24.
7. Chowbey P, Dewan A, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal
M. A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with
a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre. J
Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul–Sep;19(3):390–394. doi:10.
4103/jmas.jmas_184_22.
8. Soumpasis I, Nashef S, Dunning J, Moran P, Slack M. Safe
implementation of a next-generation surgical robot: first
analysis of 2,083 cases in the Versius surgical registry. Ann
Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):e903–e910. doi:10.1097/SLA.
0000000000005871.
9. Halabi M, Khoury K, Alomar A, Dahdah JE, Hassan O,
Hayyan K, Bishara E, Moussa H. Operative efficiency: a
comparative analysis of Versius and da Vinci robotic systems
in abdominal surgery. J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 22;18(1):132.
doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01806-5.
10. Alkatout I, Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L. Assessment of the
Versius robotic surgical system in minimal access surgery: a
systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 28;11(13):3754.
doi:10.3390/jcm11133754.
11. Kubiak M, Doniec J, Grasso SV, Gumbs A, Mohammadi AN,
Sêd³ak K, Pelc Z, GóŸdŸ S, Za³uska W, Bachta A, Rybojad
P, Torres K, Pawlik TM, Zawadzki M, Budzyñski A, RawiczPruszyñski K. Quality over quantity-current challenges of
robotic surgery in Poland. J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 3;19(1):258.
doi:10.1007/s11701-025-02423-0.
12. Shen S, Xie D, Ding A, Zhang L, Creighton F. Factors shaping
public perceptions of a range of robotic technologies in
surgery: cross-sectional web-based survey. JMIR Hum Factors.
2025 Nov 20;12:e64224. doi:10.2196/64224.
13. Butt UI, Ayyaz M, Farooka MW, Umar M. Robotic-assisted
cholecystectomy: experience from Pakistan. J Coll Physicians
Surg Pak. 2025;35(10):1331–1334. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.
2025.10.1331.
14. Shoaib A, Ullah K, Dogar AW, Umar M, Ahmed B, Ghwas
AK. Initial experience of robot-assisted cholecystectomy at
Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences
Gambat. Professional Med J. 2025;32(11):1432-1437. doi:10.
29309/TPMJ/2025.32.11.9667.
15. Song Z, Wang G, Zhu L, Yi B, Li P, Zhu S, Sun L. Basic
performance of domestic surgical robot and the safety and
effectiveness of integrated energy equipment. Zhong Nan Da
Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Feb 28;48(2):221–230.
English, Chinese. doi:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220053.
16. Cadière GB, Himpens J, Poras M, Pau L, Boyer N, Cadière
B. First human surgery using a surgical assistance robotics
device for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc. 2023
Oct;37(10):7812–7818. doi:10.1007/s00464-023-10296-3.
Epub 2023 Aug 21.
17. Campbell S, Lee SH, Liu Y, Wren SM. A retrospective study
of laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and open emergent/urgent
cholecystectomy based on the PINC AI Healthcare Database
2017–2020. World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):55.
doi:10.1186/s13017-023-00521-8.
18. Cepolina F, Razzoli R. Review of robotic surgery platforms
and end effectors. J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 13;18(1):74.
doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01781-x.
19. Willuth E, Hardon SF, Lang F, Haney CM, Felinska EA,
Kowalewski KF, Nickel F. Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy
is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial
training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a
randomized crossover study. Surg Endosc. 2021. doi:10.1007/
s00464-021-08373-6.
20. Rahimi AM, Hardon SF, Willuth E, Lang F, Haney CM,
Felinska EA, Daams F. Force-based assessment of tissue
handling skills in simulation training for robot-assisted surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00464-023-09905-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
