Modified Difficulty Index Adding Extremely Difficult for Mandibular Third Molar Extraction

Authors

  • Numrah Shakeel Malik Author
  • Ayesha Maqsood Author
  • Sidra Ayaz Author
  • Minahil Fatima Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Impacted, Molar, Third, Radiography, Panoramic, Mandible, Surgical Difficulty Index

Abstract

 Objective: To evaluate the frequency and distribution of difficulty levels in impacted mandibular third molar extractions using the Modified Difficulty Index (MDI), and to assess intra-observer agreement with the index components.

 

Study Design and Setting: A cross-sectional study carried out in the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery department of Foundation University College of Dentistry & Hospital for a six months duration.

 

Methodology: Consecutive patients (n = 225) with fully impacted mandibular third molars, aged 18–60 years, were enrolled. Panoramic radiographs were scored by a single researcher using the MDI (spatial relationship, depth, ramus/space). MDI scores totalled (3–12) were grouped as slightly, moderately difficult, very difficult, and extremely difficult. Data were analysed with SPSS v27; categorical data as frequencies (%), continuous as mean ± SD; quadratic weighted kappa measured agreement; p = 0.05 is significant.

 

Results: The mean age was 29.31 ± 8.64 yrs; 86 (38.2%) males and 139 (61.8%) females. Kappa values showed substantial agreement for spatial relationship (0.775), depth (0.744), and ramus relationship (0.663); overall total-score agreement was 0.855. Distribution: Category I 14 (6.2%), II 164 (72.9%), III 34 (15.1%), IV 13 (5.8%). Horizontal impaction (39.1%) and Level B depth (46.7%) were most common. Older age correlated with higher difficulty (P < 0.001).

 

Conclusion: The Modified Difficulty Index (MDI) demonstrates high intraobserver agreement for radiographic scoring of fully impacted mandibular third molars and describes the distribution of radiographic difficulty categories in this singlecenter sample. A small subset of cases were classified as extremely difficult radiographically. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Vranckx M, Fieuws S, Jacobs R, Politis C. Surgical experience

and patient morbidity after third molar removal. J Stomatol

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(3):297–302.

2. de Baranda BS, Silvestre FJ, Márquez Arrico CF, Silvestre

Rangil J. Surgical difficulty and postoperative course of the

third molar extraction under general anesthesia: an intervention

trial. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;125(2):e101663.

3. Jeyashree T, Kumar MS. Evaluation of difficulty index of

impacted mandibular third molar extractions. J Adv Pharm

Technol Res. 2022;13(Suppl 1):S98–S101.

4. Lambade P, Dawane P, Mali D. Assessment of difficulty in

mandibular third molar surgery by Lambade Dawane Mali’s

index. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;81(6):772–779.

5. Mottl R, Kunderová M, Slezák R, Schmidt J. Iatrogenic

fracture of the lower jaw: a rare complication of lower molar

extraction. Acta Med. 2021;64(2):101–107.

6. de Souza Junior EF, de Brito J, Silva JA, Xavier CMR, Lucena

EEdS, de Morais HHA. Preemptive analgesia in third molar

surgery: a randomized clinical trial comparing two multimodal

associations. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac.

2022;63(1):12–19.

7. Kim JY, Yong HS, Park KH, Huh JK. Modified difficult index

adding extremely difficult for fully impacted mandibular third

molar extraction. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.

2019;45(6):309–315.

8. Ku JK, Chang NH, Jeong YK, Baik SH, Choi SK.

Development and validation of a difficulty index for mandibular

third molars with extraction time. J Korean Assoc Oral

Maxillofac Surg. 2020;46(5):328–334.

9. Dignam M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for postoperative

complications after tooth extraction: a narrative review. J Oral

Maxillofac Surg. 2024;82(3):451–459. doi:10.1016/j.joms.

2023.12.004

10. Yotsova T, et al. Management of postoperative sequelae

following impacted wisdom tooth extraction: an updated

review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025;54(2):210–218.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2024.09.012

11. Akdoðan E, et al. Artificial intelligence supported panoramic

radiograph analysis for predicting difficulty and nerve injury

risk in mandibular third molar surgery. Clin Oral Investig.

2025;29(1):115–124. doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05678-z

12. Zhang Y, et al. Deep learning classification of surgical difficulty

in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. Comput Biol

Med. 2025;168:107635. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed. 2024.

107635

13. Jeyashree S, Kumar A. Evaluation of Pederson’s difficulty

index in impacted mandibular third molar extractions: a

clinical study. J Dent Oral Health. 2022;9(1):33–39. doi:10.

1016/j.jdentoh.2022.01.005

14. Karamatullah S, et al. Assessment of Pederson’s difficulty

index in a Pakistani population: validation study. Pak Oral

Dent J. 2025;45(2):89–95. doi:10.1007/s00784-025-05987-

y

15. Önder E, et al. Development of a multidomain

clinical–radiographic difficulty scale for mandibular third

molar extraction: correlation with operation time. Br J Oral

Maxillofac Surg. 2026;64(1):12–19. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.

2025.11.003

16. Simons A, et al. Association of Pell & Gregory and Winter

classifications with coronectomy decisions in mandibular

third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral

Radiol. 2024;137(4):456–463. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.01.012

17. Patel H, et al. Prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular

third molars using Pell & Gregory and Winter classifications

in Gujarat population. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2024;98(2):77–83.

doi:10.4103/jida.2024.77

18. Anggraini R, Okviannas Y. Prevalence of impacted mandibular

third molars and classification based on Pell & Gregory in

Indonesian patients. Indones J Dent Res. 2025;14(1):25–31.

doi:10.1016/j.ijdr.2025.02.004

19. Dudde M, et al. Is age a risk factor for complications in

impacted third molar surgery? A multicenter analysis. Clin

Oral Investig. 2024;28(5):1453–1461. doi:10.1007/s00784-

024-05521-1

20. StatPearls [Internet]. Mandibular third molar extraction.

Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [updated

2025 Jan]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.

gov/books/NBK589664.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Modified Difficulty Index Adding Extremely Difficult for Mandibular Third Molar Extraction. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(04), 908-914. https://doi.org/10.51985/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.