Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing – Understanding the Fine Line Between Assistance and Academic Misconduct

Authors

  • Iqbal Hussain Udaipurwala Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Abstract

 The explosion of artificial intelligence (AI) in biomedical research and clinical documentation heralds a new era in medical writing.1,2,3 AI-driven tools, predominantly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, GPT-4, DeepSeek, Scholar GPT and other natural language processing systems, have introduced unprecedented efficiency in generating, translating, summarizing, and editing medical content 

References

1. Wang C, Liu S, Yang H, Guo J, Wu Y, Liu J. Ethical

Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care. J Med

Internet Res. 2023; 25: e48009. https://www.jmir.org/2023/

1/e48009. DOI: 10.2196/48009.

2. Filippi CG, Stein JM, Wang Z, Bakas S, Liu Y, Chang PD,

Lui Y, Hess C, Barboriak DP, Flanders AE, Wintermark M,

Zaharchuk G, Wu O. Ethical Considerations and Fairness in

the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Neuroradiology. AJNR

Am J Neuroradiol. 2023; 44(11): 1242-1248. doi: 10.3174

/ajnr.A7963.

3. Grzybowski A, Jin K, Wu H. Challenges of artificial

intelligence in medicine and dermatology. Clin Dermatol.

2024; 42(3): 210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.12.013.

4. Anders BA. Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both,

neither, or forward thinking? Patterns (N Y). 2023; 4(3):

100694. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100694.

5. Liebrenz M, Schleifer R, Buadze A, Bhugra D, Smith A.

Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges

for medical publishing. Lancet Digit Health. 2023; 5(3): e105-

e106. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5.

6. Hryciw BN, Seely AJE, Kyeremanteng K. Guiding principles

and proposed classification system for the responsible adoption

of artificial intelligence in scientific writing in medicine. Front

Artif Intell. 2023; 6: 1283353. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1283353.

7. Yang Y, Lin M, Zhao H, Peng Y, Huang F, Lu Z. A survey of

recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in

biomedicine. J Biomed Inform. 2024; 154: 104646. doi:

10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104646.

8. Hanna MG, Pantanowitz L, Jackson B, Palmer O, Visweswaran

S, Pantanowitz J, Deebajah M, Rashidi HH. Ethical and Bias

Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning.

Mod Pathol. 2025; 38(3): 100686. doi: 10.1016/j. modpat.

2024.100686.

9. Jeyaraman M, Ramasubramanian S, Balaji S, Jeyaraman N,

Nallakumarasamy A, Sharma S. ChatGPT in action: Harnessing

artificial intelligence potential and addressing ethical challenges

in medicine, education, and scientific research. World J

Methodol. 2023; 13(4): 170-178. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.170.

10. Collins GS, Dhiman P, Andaur Navarro CL, et al. Protocol

for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and

risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic

prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ

Open, 2021; 11: e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008.

11. Naik N, Hameed BMZ, Shetty DK, Swain D, Shah M, Paul

R, Aggarwal K, Ibrahim S, Patil V, Smriti K, Shetty S, Rai

BP, Chlosta P, Somani BK. Legal and Ethical Consideration

in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes

Responsibility? Front Surg. 2022; 9: 862322. doi:

10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322.

12. El Emam K, Jonker E, Arbuckle L, Malin B. A systematic

review of re-identification attacks on health data. PLoS One.

2011; 6(12): e28071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028071

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14