Assessment of Neonatal Outcomes in Relation to Non-Reassuring CTG during Labor

Authors

  • Seemab Pirzada Author
  • Shamaila Shamaun Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Non-reassuring cardiotocography, fetal distress, intrapartum fetal monitoring, neonatal outcomes, Apgar score

Abstract

 Objective: To assess the association of specific non-reassuring intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) features with early neonatal outcomes, particularly low 5-minute Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

 

Study design and setting: Descriptive longitudinal study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dow University Hospital, Karachi.

 

Methodology: A total of 188 women with singleton term pregnancies and non-reassuring intrapartum CTG were enrolled by non-probability consecutive sampling. CTG features were classified using a standardized operational framework, and maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Associations with low 5-minute Apgar score and NICU admission were examined using bivariate analyses. The reported multivariable logistic regression models were treated as exploratory because the available records did not document the original model-building diagnostics in sufficient detail.

 

Results: Mean maternal age was 28.4 ± 5.2 years and mean gestational age at delivery was 38.6 ± 1.1 weeks. Cesarean delivery occurred in 104 (55.3%) women. Reduced baseline variability was present in 82 (43.6%) tracings and late decelerations in 51 (27.1%). Mean Apgar score increased from 6.6 ± 1.5 at 1 minute to 8.1 ± 1.2 at 5 minutes. Low 5-minute Apgar score occurred in 34 (18.1%) neonates and 50 (26.6%) were admitted to the NICU. Reduced baseline variability and late decelerations were significantly associated with both adverse outcomes.

 

Conclusion: Reduced baseline variability and late decelerations were associated with adverse early neonatal outcomes, including low 5-minute Apgar score and NICU admission. These observational findings support careful CTG interpretation but do not establish that CTG-directed intervention itself improves neonatal outcomes 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al Wattar BH, Honess E, Bunnewell S, Welton NJ, Quenby

S, Khan KS, et al. Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal

surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a

systematic review and network meta-analysis. CMAJ.

2021;193(14). doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202538

2. Hussain NM, O’Halloran M, McDermott B, Elahi MA. Fetal

monitoring technologies for the detection of intrapartum

hypoxia - challenges and opportunities. Biomed Phys Eng

Express. 2024;10(2):022002. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad17a6

3. Singh SK, Kumar R, Agarwal A, Tyagi A, Bisht SS.

Intrapartum cardiotocographic monitoring and its correlation

with neonatal outcome. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(11):

7398-7405. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1525_22

4. Nazir L, Lakhta G, Anees K, Khan FR, Safdar S, Nazir GR.

Admission cardiotocography as a predictor of low Apgar

score: an observational, cross-sectional study. Cureus.

2021;13(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.14530

5. Nabipour Hosseini ST, Abbasalizadeh F, Abbasalizadeh S,

Mousavi S, Amiri P. A comparative study of CTG monitoring

one hour before labor in infants born with and without asphyxia.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):758. doi:

10.1186/s12884-023-06040-3

6. Bello Oluwasomidoyin O, Unwaha Emmanuel A, Bello

Folasade A. Admission cardiotocography and neonatal

outcomes at a tertiary health facility in Southwestern Nigeria.

Ann Afr Med. 2024;23(2):154-159. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam

_102_22

7. di Pasquo E, Fieni S, Chandraharan E, Dall’Asta A, Morganelli

G, Spinelli M, et al. Correlation between intrapartum CTG

findings and interleukin-6 levels in the umbilical cord arterial

blood: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol

Reprod Biol. 2024;294:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2024.

01.018

8. Zullo F, Di Mascio D, Raghuraman N, Wagner S, Brunelli R,

Giancotti A, et al. Three-tiered fetal heart rate interpretation

system and adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes: a

systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol.

2023;229(4):377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.008

9. Murphy DJ, Devane D, Molloy E, Shahabuddin Y. Fetal scalp

stimulation for assessing fetal well-being during labour.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;1(1). doi: 10.1002/

14651858.CD013808.pub2

10. Blix E, Brurberg KG, Reierth E, Reinar LM, Øian P. ST

waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for

intrapartum fetal monitoring: an updated systematic review

and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol

Scand. 2024;103(3):437-448. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14752.

11. Tarvonen M, Hovi P, Sainio S, Vuorela P, Andersson S, Teramo

K. Intrapartum zigzag pattern of fetal heart rate is an early

sign of fetal hypoxia: a large obstetric retrospective cohort

study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(2):252-262. doi:

10.1111/aogs.14007.

12. Fogelberg M, Dahlbäck C, Ekengård F, Rickle G, Herbst A.

Association between different types and characteristics of

fetal deceleration during labour and neonatal acidemia at

delivery: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod

Biol X. 2025;26:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100389.

13. Eenkhoorn C, van den Wildenberg S, Goos TG, Dankelman

J, Franx A, Eggink AJ. A systematic catalog of studies on

fetal heart rate pattern and neonatal outcome variables. J

Perinat Med. 2025;53(1):94-109. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-

0364

14. Paikaray S, Jena SK, Balakrishnan D, Mohanty PK. Correlation

of cardiotocography with combined APGAR scores and

diagnostic performance of umbilical cord parameters in

predicting low combined APGAR scores: a prospective cohort

study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024;23:100329.

doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100329

15. Ito A, Hayata E, Kotaki H, Shimabukuro M, Takano M,

Nagasaki S, et al. The iPREFACE score is useful for predicting

fetal acidemia: a retrospective cohort study of 113 patients

who underwent emergency cesarean section for non-reassuring

fetal status during labor. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024;4(2):100343.

doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100343

16. Neri S, Ramirez Zegarra R, Dininno M, Di Pasquo E,

Tagliaferri S, Ghi T. Interobserver agreement of intrapartum

cardiotocography interpretation by midwives using current

FIGO and physiology-based guidelines. J Matern Fetal

Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2425758.

17. Mendez-Figueroa H, Bicocca MJ, Bhalwal AB, Fishel Bartal

M. Preterm cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart

rate tracing: risk factors and predictability of adverse outcomes.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;276:207-212. doi:

10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.023.

18. Martin JK, Oyelese Y, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos

AM, Chavez MR, et al. Unexpected term neonatal intensive

care unit admissions and centralized remote fetal monitoring.

Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(8):856-864. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-

1727214

19. Gao H, Tao H, Zou L, Luo QQ, Zhang WY. A multicenter

retrospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes in idiopathic

oligohydramnios at term. Int J Womens Health. 2025;17:1665-

1672. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S508609

20. Godhard E, Michelotti F, Hayes DJL, Heazell AEP. Evaluating

the diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp blood sampling: a

retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.

2025;306:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039

21. McCoy JA, Levine LD, Wan G, Chivers C, Teel J, La Cava

WG. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring to

predict acidemia at birth with the use of deep learning. Am

J Obstet Gynecol. 2025;232(1):116.e1-116.e9. doi: 10.1016/j

.ajog.2024.04.022

22. Ben M’Barek I, Jauvion G, Vitrou J, Holmström E, Koskas

M, Ceccaldi PF. DeepCTG 1.0: an interpretable model to

detect fetal hypoxia from cardiotocography data during labor

and delivery. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1190441. doi: 10.3389/

fped.2023.1190441

23. Menzhulina E, Vitrou J, Merrer J, Holmstrom E, Ait Amara

I, Le Pennec E, et al. Integration of clinical features in a

computerized cardiotocography system to predict severe

newborn acidemia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.

2025;307:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.030

24. Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, FIGO

Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO

consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring:

cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13-24.

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Assessment of Neonatal Outcomes in Relation to Non-Reassuring CTG during Labor. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(04), 973-980. https://doi.org/10.51985/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 93

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.