Assessment of Neonatal Outcomes in Relation to Non-Reassuring CTG during Labor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51985/Keywords:
Non-reassuring cardiotocography, fetal distress, intrapartum fetal monitoring, neonatal outcomes, Apgar scoreAbstract
Objective: To assess the association of specific non-reassuring intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) features with early neonatal outcomes, particularly low 5-minute Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.
Study design and setting: Descriptive longitudinal study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dow University Hospital, Karachi.
Methodology: A total of 188 women with singleton term pregnancies and non-reassuring intrapartum CTG were enrolled by non-probability consecutive sampling. CTG features were classified using a standardized operational framework, and maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Associations with low 5-minute Apgar score and NICU admission were examined using bivariate analyses. The reported multivariable logistic regression models were treated as exploratory because the available records did not document the original model-building diagnostics in sufficient detail.
Results: Mean maternal age was 28.4 ± 5.2 years and mean gestational age at delivery was 38.6 ± 1.1 weeks. Cesarean delivery occurred in 104 (55.3%) women. Reduced baseline variability was present in 82 (43.6%) tracings and late decelerations in 51 (27.1%). Mean Apgar score increased from 6.6 ± 1.5 at 1 minute to 8.1 ± 1.2 at 5 minutes. Low 5-minute Apgar score occurred in 34 (18.1%) neonates and 50 (26.6%) were admitted to the NICU. Reduced baseline variability and late decelerations were significantly associated with both adverse outcomes.
Conclusion: Reduced baseline variability and late decelerations were associated with adverse early neonatal outcomes, including low 5-minute Apgar score and NICU admission. These observational findings support careful CTG interpretation but do not establish that CTG-directed intervention itself improves neonatal outcomes
Downloads
References
1. Al Wattar BH, Honess E, Bunnewell S, Welton NJ, Quenby
S, Khan KS, et al. Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal
surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a
systematic review and network meta-analysis. CMAJ.
2021;193(14). doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202538
2. Hussain NM, O’Halloran M, McDermott B, Elahi MA. Fetal
monitoring technologies for the detection of intrapartum
hypoxia - challenges and opportunities. Biomed Phys Eng
Express. 2024;10(2):022002. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad17a6
3. Singh SK, Kumar R, Agarwal A, Tyagi A, Bisht SS.
Intrapartum cardiotocographic monitoring and its correlation
with neonatal outcome. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(11):
7398-7405. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1525_22
4. Nazir L, Lakhta G, Anees K, Khan FR, Safdar S, Nazir GR.
Admission cardiotocography as a predictor of low Apgar
score: an observational, cross-sectional study. Cureus.
2021;13(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.14530
5. Nabipour Hosseini ST, Abbasalizadeh F, Abbasalizadeh S,
Mousavi S, Amiri P. A comparative study of CTG monitoring
one hour before labor in infants born with and without asphyxia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):758. doi:
10.1186/s12884-023-06040-3
6. Bello Oluwasomidoyin O, Unwaha Emmanuel A, Bello
Folasade A. Admission cardiotocography and neonatal
outcomes at a tertiary health facility in Southwestern Nigeria.
Ann Afr Med. 2024;23(2):154-159. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam
_102_22
7. di Pasquo E, Fieni S, Chandraharan E, Dall’Asta A, Morganelli
G, Spinelli M, et al. Correlation between intrapartum CTG
findings and interleukin-6 levels in the umbilical cord arterial
blood: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 2024;294:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2024.
01.018
8. Zullo F, Di Mascio D, Raghuraman N, Wagner S, Brunelli R,
Giancotti A, et al. Three-tiered fetal heart rate interpretation
system and adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2023;229(4):377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.008
9. Murphy DJ, Devane D, Molloy E, Shahabuddin Y. Fetal scalp
stimulation for assessing fetal well-being during labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;1(1). doi: 10.1002/
14651858.CD013808.pub2
10. Blix E, Brurberg KG, Reierth E, Reinar LM, Øian P. ST
waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for
intrapartum fetal monitoring: an updated systematic review
and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand. 2024;103(3):437-448. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14752.
11. Tarvonen M, Hovi P, Sainio S, Vuorela P, Andersson S, Teramo
K. Intrapartum zigzag pattern of fetal heart rate is an early
sign of fetal hypoxia: a large obstetric retrospective cohort
study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(2):252-262. doi:
10.1111/aogs.14007.
12. Fogelberg M, Dahlbäck C, Ekengård F, Rickle G, Herbst A.
Association between different types and characteristics of
fetal deceleration during labour and neonatal acidemia at
delivery: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Biol X. 2025;26:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100389.
13. Eenkhoorn C, van den Wildenberg S, Goos TG, Dankelman
J, Franx A, Eggink AJ. A systematic catalog of studies on
fetal heart rate pattern and neonatal outcome variables. J
Perinat Med. 2025;53(1):94-109. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-
0364
14. Paikaray S, Jena SK, Balakrishnan D, Mohanty PK. Correlation
of cardiotocography with combined APGAR scores and
diagnostic performance of umbilical cord parameters in
predicting low combined APGAR scores: a prospective cohort
study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024;23:100329.
doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100329
15. Ito A, Hayata E, Kotaki H, Shimabukuro M, Takano M,
Nagasaki S, et al. The iPREFACE score is useful for predicting
fetal acidemia: a retrospective cohort study of 113 patients
who underwent emergency cesarean section for non-reassuring
fetal status during labor. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024;4(2):100343.
doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100343
16. Neri S, Ramirez Zegarra R, Dininno M, Di Pasquo E,
Tagliaferri S, Ghi T. Interobserver agreement of intrapartum
cardiotocography interpretation by midwives using current
FIGO and physiology-based guidelines. J Matern Fetal
Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2425758.
17. Mendez-Figueroa H, Bicocca MJ, Bhalwal AB, Fishel Bartal
M. Preterm cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart
rate tracing: risk factors and predictability of adverse outcomes.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;276:207-212. doi:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.023.
18. Martin JK, Oyelese Y, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos
AM, Chavez MR, et al. Unexpected term neonatal intensive
care unit admissions and centralized remote fetal monitoring.
Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(8):856-864. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-
1727214
19. Gao H, Tao H, Zou L, Luo QQ, Zhang WY. A multicenter
retrospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes in idiopathic
oligohydramnios at term. Int J Womens Health. 2025;17:1665-
1672. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S508609
20. Godhard E, Michelotti F, Hayes DJL, Heazell AEP. Evaluating
the diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp blood sampling: a
retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2025;306:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039
21. McCoy JA, Levine LD, Wan G, Chivers C, Teel J, La Cava
WG. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring to
predict acidemia at birth with the use of deep learning. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 2025;232(1):116.e1-116.e9. doi: 10.1016/j
.ajog.2024.04.022
22. Ben M’Barek I, Jauvion G, Vitrou J, Holmström E, Koskas
M, Ceccaldi PF. DeepCTG 1.0: an interpretable model to
detect fetal hypoxia from cardiotocography data during labor
and delivery. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1190441. doi: 10.3389/
fped.2023.1190441
23. Menzhulina E, Vitrou J, Merrer J, Holmstrom E, Ait Amara
I, Le Pennec E, et al. Integration of clinical features in a
computerized cardiotocography system to predict severe
newborn acidemia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2025;307:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.030
24. Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, FIGO
Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO
consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring:
cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13-24.
doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0