Visual Prostate Symptom Score versus International Prostate Symptom Score with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Authors

  • Khalid Hussain Author
  • Maria Tariq Author
  • Muhammad Asif Author
  • Obaid Adil Author
  • Jawad Ahmed Author
  • Talal Habib Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

Benign prostatic enlargement, Internal prostate scoring system, Visual prostate scoring symptom

Abstract

 bjective: Benign prostatic enlargement is a common issue in ageing men, causing significant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This study compares the effectiveness of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Visual Prostate Symptom Score (VPSS) in assessing LUTS severity among BPH patients in Pakistan, focusing on ease of use, symptom grading, and correlation with uroflowmetry results.

 

Study design and setting: Prospective observational study conducted at the OPD of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital and Gujranwala Medical College Teaching Hospital, from April 24 to September 24.

 

Methodology: A total of 220 patients over 40 years with LUTS completed IPSS and VPSS assessments, with time taken recorded. Uroflowmetry (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVRV), and bladder wall thickness were measured before and after one month of á-blocker therapy. Data were analysed using paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation, and chi-square test to evaluate association.

 

Results: VPSS took 3-4 minutes for those with primary education, compared to 8-10 minutes for IPSS. Symptom severity grading between IPSS andVPSS showed positive correlation (r = 0.582, P< 0.001). VPSS scores showed significant correlation with post-treatment improvements in Q max, bladder wall thickness and improvement in PMRV after treatment, confirming its reliability in symptom assessment and treatment monitoring.

 

Conclusion: VPSS is a reliable, quicker alternative to IPSS, especially for populations with lower literacy. It correlates well with symptom severity and treatment outcomes, making it suitable for broader clinical use in diverse settings. 

References

1. Laranjo-Tinoco C, Ferreira F, Anacleto S, Cardoso A, Araújo

AS, Oliveira C. A prospective comparison of the Visual

Prostate Symptom Score versus the International Prostate

Symptom Score in Portuguese men. Urological Science.

2024;35(1):51-6. Doi: 10.1097/us9.0000000000000003

2. Chatterjee S, Kumar A, Pal DK. Study of correlation between

visual prostate symptom score and international prostate

symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms

with reference to uroflowmetry parameters in the Indian

population. Urologia Journal. 2023;90(2):377-80. Doi:

10.1177/03915603231157573

3. Rivera-Oliva DD. Visual prostate symptom score (VPSS). Is

it an effective alternative for the assessment of lower urinary

tract symptoms? Experience in a reference centre in

southeastern Mexico. Revista Mexicanade

Urología. 2022;81(6). Doi: 10.48193/rev istamexic anadeur

ologa.v81i6.818

4. Shah RS, Mishra K, Sah S, Yadav D, Neupane B, Shakya I,

Thapa N. Correlation between the Visual Prostate Symptom

Score and International Prostate Symptom Score in Patients

with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Journal of

Nobel Medical College. 2024;13(1):55-9. Doi: 10.3126

/jonmc.v13i1.68105

5. de Moraes Lopes MH, D'Ancona CA, Moretti TB, Higa R,

Victal ML, Camisão AR, Braga DA, Reis LO. Validation of

visual prostate symptom score (VPSS) in Brazilian sample

population. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing.

2023;50(4):326-30. Doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000996

6. Liu Z, Guan Z, Lan H, Zhao Y, Ye Z, Lv D, Yu Q, Wang M,

Peng K, Fu N, Mazzon G. Evaluating the lower urinary tract

syndrome with a telemedicine application: an exploration of

the electronic audiovisual prostate symptom score. Frontiers

in Surgery. 2022;9:848923. Doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.848923

7. Schlatmann FW, van Balken MR, de Winter AF, de Jong IJ,

Jansen CJ. How do patients understand questions about lower

urinary tract symptoms? A qualitative study of problems in

completing urological questionnaires. International Journal

of Environmental Research and Public Health.

2022;19(15):9650. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159650

8. Glaser AP, Kristof TW, Judge C, Javitch G, Hirsch S, Talaty

P, Helfand BT, Smith AR, Griffith JW. The 10-item LURN

Symptom Index (LURN SI-10) detects additional symptoms

and shows convergent validity with the IPSS in men presenting

with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 2023;171:184-

9. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.10.019

9. Guzelsoy M, Erkan A, Ozturk M, Zengin S, Coban S, Turkoglu

AR, Koc A. Comparison of three questionnaire forms used

in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms: A prospective

study. Prostate International. 2022;10(4):218-23. Doi:

10.1016/j.prnil.2022.06.001

10. Victor A, Okigbeye D. Benign Prostatic Enlargement, the

International Prostate Symptoms Score and a Review of Other

Symptom Scores. Open Journal of Urology. 2022;12(8):427-

39. Doi: 10.4236/oju.2022.128042

11. Gewanter RM, Sandhu JS, Tin AL, Gross JP, Mazzarella K,

Urban J, Elsebai N, Hopkins MF, Vickers AJ, Zelefsky MJ.

Assessment of patients with prostate cancer and their

understanding of the international prostate symptom score

questionnaire. Advances in Radiation Oncology.

2023;8(4):101200. Doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101200

12. Roy, Ashutosh; Singh, Amandeep1,; Sidhu, Darshan Singh;

Jindal, R1; Malhotra, Mishi; Kaur, Haramritpal. New Visual

Prostate Symptom Score versus International Prostate

Symptom Score in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms:

A Prospective Comparision in Indian Rural Population.

Nigerian Journal of Surgery 22(2):p 111-117, Jul–Dec 2016.

| DOI: 10.4103/1117-6806.189002

13. Tamalunas A, Schott M, Keller P, Atzler M, Ebner B, Buchner

A, Stief CG, Magistro G. How does symptom severity impact

clinical outcomes of men with lower urinary tract symptoms

after holmium laser enucleation or transurethral resection of

the prostate?. Central European Journal of Urology.

2022;75(4):387. Doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.161

14. Yao MW, Green JS. How international is the International

Prostate Symptom Score? A literature review of validated

translations of the IPSS, the most widely used self-administered

patient questionnaire for male lower urinary tract symptoms.

LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2022;14(2):92-101.

Doi: 10.1111/luts.12415

15. Hamza BK, Ahmed M, Bello A, Tolani MA, Awaisu M, Lawal

AT, Oyelowo N, Abdulsalam KI, Lawal L, Sudi A, Maitama

HY. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with

severity of lower urinary symptoms among patients with

benign prostatic hyperplasia. African Journal of Urology.

2021;27:1-7. Doi: 10.1186/s12301-020-00102-0

16. Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Lane JA, Lewis AL, Abrams P, Blair

PS, Ito H, Chapple C, Drake MJ. Prostate surgery for men

with lower urinary tract symptoms: do we need urodynamics

to find the right candidates? Exploratory findings from the

UPSTREAM trial. European Urology Focus. 2022;8(5):1331-

9. Doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.11.010

17. Vartolomei L, Cotru? A, Tãtaru SO, Vartolomei MD, Man A,

Ferro M, Stanciu C, Sin AI, Shariat SF. Lower urinary tract

symptoms are associated with clinically relevant depression,

anxiety, and stress symptoms. The Aging Male. 2022;25(1):62-

6. Doi: 10.1080/13685538.2022.2040981

18. Awaisu M, Ahmed M, Lawal AT, Sudi A, Tolani MA, Oyelowo

N, Muhammad MS, Bello A, Maitama HY. Correlation of

prostate volume with severity of lower urinary tract symptoms

as measured by international prostate symptoms score and

maximum urine flow rate among patients with benign prostatic

hyperplasia. African Journal of Urology. 2021;27:1-7. Doi:

10.1186/s12301-021-00122-4

19. Albarqouni L, Sanders S, Clark J, Tikkinen KA, Glasziou P.

Self-management for men with lower urinary tract symptoms:

a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Annals of Family

Medicine. 2021;19(2):157-67. Doi: 10.1370/afm.2609

20. Creta M, Russo GI, Bhojani N, Drake MJ, Gratzke C,

Peyronnet B, Roehrborn C, Tikkinen KA, Cornu JN, Fusco

F. Bladder outlet obstruction relief and symptom improvement

following medical and surgical therapies for lower urinary

tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia:

A systematic review. European urology. 2024. Doi:

10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.031

21. Law YX, Castellani D, Dell'atti L, Aho T, Teoh JY, Gauhar

V. Differences in surgical and functional outcomes in benign

prostate hyperplasia patients with only lower urinary tract

symptoms versus those in retention: A systematic review and

meta-analysis. Neurourology and Urodynamics.

2021;40(6):1389-401. Doi: 10.1002/nau.24708

22. Malde S, Umbach R, Wheeler JR, Lytvyn L, Cornu JN, Gacci

M, Gratzke C, Herrmann TR, Mamoulakis C, Rieken M,

Speakman MJ. A systematic review of patients’ values,

preferences, and expectations for the diagnosis and treatment

of male lower urinary tract symptoms. European urology.

2021;79(6):796-809. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.019

23. Cornu JN, Zantek P, Burtt G, Martin C, Martin A, Springate

C, Chughtai B. Minimally invasive treatments for benign

prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. European urology. 2023;83(6):534-47. Doi:

10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.028

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

Issue

Section

Original Articles