Comparison of Holmium Laser versus Cold Knife Treatment in Patients with Urethral Strictures

Authors

  • Immad Ud Din Author
  • Muhammad Farrukh Naveed Author
  • Asra Aleem Author
  • Syed Ahmad Farooqi Author
  • Zeeshan Nasir Author
  • Ahmad Sajjad Habibi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/

Keywords:

urethral stricture, holmium laser, urethrotomy

Abstract

 Objective: The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of optical internal urethrotomy, which uses a holmium laser in comparison to a cold knife, in treating short-segment urethral strictures in our local setting.

 

Study design & Settings: Randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07505316) at the Department of Urology, Kidney Center- Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur.

 

Methods: Males aged 18 to 70 years with short segment urethral strictures (length <2 cm), planned to undergo internal urethrotomy were included. Patients with multiple or recurrent strictures, active urinary tract infections, complete urethral obliteration on urethroscopy, with pan-anterior strictures, posterior stenosis, failed prior interventions, were not included. Patients were randomly divided into group A (cold-knife) and group B (holmium laser) through lottery method using sealed opaque envelopes. Post procedure uroflowmetry was performed after 30 days and assessor was not aware of procedures performed

 

Findings: The mean Qmax of the holmium laser group was 18.9 +/- 3.5 ml/sec 30 days after surgery, as compared to the cold-knife group (14.8 +/- 3.2 ml/sec). This was found to be very statistically significant (p < 0.001), which indicated that the cold-knife method did not significantly enhance the urine flow rate compared to holmium laser urethrotomy. Conclusion: In individuals with short-segment urethral strictures, cold-knife and holmium laser urethrotomy both significantly increase urine flow, but the traditional method of holmium laser urethrotomy has a significantly higher post-operative Qmax. 

References

1. Payne SR, Anderson P, Spasojeviæ N, Demilow TL, Teferi

G, Dickerson D. Male urethral stricture disease: why

management guidelines are challenging in low-income

countries. BJU Int. 2022;130(2):157–165. DOI: https://doi.org/

10.1111/bju.15678

2. Bugeja S, Payne SR, Eardley I, Mundy AR. The standard for

the management of male urethral strictures in the UK: a

consensus document. J Clin Urol. 2021;14(1):10–20. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415820959824.

3. Chen C, Qin J, Wang C, Huang H, Li H, Wen Z, et al.

Comparison of laser versus cold knife visual internal

urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture (stricture

length <2 cm): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(18):e37524. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037524.

4. Faizan M, Mahboob E, Samad MA, Fatima L, Fatima A,

Iqbal A, et al. Safety and efficacy of lasers compared to cold

knife in direct visual internal urethrotomy: a systematic review

and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39(1):209. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03890-55. Cebeci OÖ. Is endourological intervention a suitable treatment

option in the management of iatrogenic thermal ureteral

injury? A contemporary case series. BMC Urol.

2022;22(1):137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-

01083-0

6. Srilakshmi N, Hegre PS. Prospective comparative study of

visual internal urethrotomy and visual internal urethrotomy

with intralesional triamcinolone and mitomycin C in treatment

of stricture urethra. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2022;9(1):198–205.

DOI: Not indexed with DOI (journal issue-based publication)

7. Del Zingaro M, Cochetti G, Zucchi A, Paladini A, De

Vermandois JA, Ciarletti S, et al. Holmium:YAG laser for the

treatment of genital and urethral warts: multicentre prospective

evaluation of safety and efficacy. J Lasers Med Sci.

2021;12:e34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.34

8. Akdemir F, Okulu E, Kayýgil Ö. Comparison of using cold

knife and holmium laser in urethral stricture: long-term

outcomes. J Urol Surg. 2023;10(4):315–320. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2023.2022.0091

9. Shaikh MI, Memon WA, Kumar R, Malik Z, Raza A, Khurshid

S. To compare the mean peak flow rate of holmium laser

versus cold knife among patients undergoing direct visual

internal urethrotomy. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023;17(6):

535–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350 /pjmhs 22176535

10. Ali Maged W, Gamal MA, Tawfeles SF. Evaluation of holmium

laser versus cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the

management of urethral stricture. QJM. 2021;114(Suppl

1):hcab110-014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/

hcab110.014

11. Lumen N, Campos-Juanatey F, Greenwell T, Martins FE,

Osman NI, Riechardt S, et al. European Association of Urology

Guidelines on Urethral Stricture Disease (Part 1): Management

of Male Urethral Stricture Disease. Eur Urol. 2021;80(2):190-

200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.eururo.2021.

05.022

12. Campos-Juanatey F, Osman NI, Greenwell T, Martins FE,

Riechardt S, Waterloos M, et al. European Association of

Urology Guidelines on Urethral Stricture Disease (Part 2):

Diagnosis, Perioperative Management, and Follow-up in

Males. Eur Urol. 2021;80(2):201-212. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.032

13. Horiguchi A, Shinchi M, Hirano Y, Asanuma H, Ishiura Y,

Inoue K, et al. Clinical questions in the Japanese Urological

Association’s 2024 clinical practice guidelines for urethral

strictures. Int J Urol. 2024;31(9):956-967. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15512

14. VanDyke ME, Morey AF, Coutinho K, Robertson KJ, D’Anna

R, Chevli K, et al. Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior

urethral stricture: 2-year results of the ROBUST III trial. BJUI

Compass. 2024;5(3):366-373. Available from: https://doi.org/

10.1002/bco2.312

15. Mahenthiran AK, Burns RT, Soyster ME, Black M, Arnold

PJ, Love HL, et al. A single-institution experience with the

Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon for management of

urethral stricture disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13(8):1498-

1505. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-104

16. Pang KH, Chapple CR, Chatters R, Downey AP, Harding CK,

Hind D, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of

Adjuncts to Minimally Invasive Treatment of Urethral Stricture

in Men. Eur Urol. 2021;80(4):467-479. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.02217. Pranata FH, Hidayatullah F, Kloping YP, Rahman ZA, Rizaldi

F, Soebadi DM. The efficacy and safety of mitomycin C intra

urethral injection to prevent recurrent urethral stricture: A

systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond).

2022;77:103576. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.amsu.2022.103576

18. Li X, Xu C, Ji X, Zhu Z, Cai T, Guo Z, et al. Balloon dilation

for the treatment of male urethral strictures: a systematic

review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024;14(2):e071923.

Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071923

19. Endo D, Robayo J, García-Perdomo HA. Predictors of urethral

stricture recurrence following internal urethrotomy: A

systematic review. Urologia. 2025;92(1):32-38. Available

from: https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241292191

20. Hernández-Hernández D, Ortega-González MY, PadillaFernández B, Díaz-González I, Climent-González J, HessMedler S. Direct Vision Internal Urethrotomy in the

Management of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Long-Term FollowUp and Factors Predicting Treatment Failure. Urol Int.

2025;109(6):560-565. Available from: https://doi.

org/10.1159/000543674

21. Yadav OK, Jain J, Navriya SC, Bhirud DP, Singh M,

Choudhary GR, et al. Outcomes and predictive factors of

recurrence after endoscopic management of male bulbar

urethral stricture at a Tertiary Care Centre. Urologia.

2025;92(4):686-692. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/

03915603251351068

22. Gul A, Ekici O, Zengin S, Barali D, Keskin T. Investigation

of risk factors in the development of recurrent urethral stricture

after internal urethrotomy. World J Clin Cases.

2024;12(14):2324-2331. Available from: https://doi.org/10.

12998/wjcc.v12.i14.2324

23. García Fernández A, Campos-Juanatey F, Calleja Hermosa

P, González Fernández A, Varea Malo R, Gutiérrez Baños

JL. Assessment of predictive factors in endoscopic internal

urethrotomy for bulbar urethral strictures. Actas Urol Esp

(Engl Ed). 2025;49(1):94-101. Available from: https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.11.004

24. Babelay G, Upadhyay R, Ahmad A, Ranjan N, Dheeraj K. A

Comprehensive Comparative Study of Direct Vision Internal

Urethrotomy and Urethroplasty in Short-Segment Bulbar

Urethral Strictures. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e76567. Available

from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76567

25. Gilbert D, Christ A, Barclay K, Gupta S, Mishra K, et al.

Efficacy of direct visual internal urethrotomy versus balloon

dilation to treat recurrent urethral stricture following failed

urethroplasty. BJUI Compass. 2025;6(1):e458. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.458

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Comparison of Holmium Laser versus Cold Knife Treatment in Patients with Urethral Strictures. (2026). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 16(03), 837-843. https://doi.org/10.51985/