An Assessment of the Shade Differences in the Anterior Teeth According to the Age and Gender, Using Commercially Available Shade Guide

Authors

  • Farzana Memon
  • Diya Ram Khatri
  • Salwa Memon
  • Daud Mirza

Keywords:

Aesthetics, Tooth shade, Shade guide, Prosthesis

Abstract

Objective: To assess the shade differences in the anterior teeth according to the age and gender using commercially available
shade guide in the local populations of Hyderabad.
Methodology: This cross sectional study comprised of 200 patients belonging to both genders ranging in age from 15 to 75
years, divided into four groups on the basis of chronological age: Group I: 15 to 30, group II: 31 to 45 , group III: 46 to 60
and group IV: 61 and onwards. 
Data was analyzed via SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistics such as percentage, frequency distribution, cross tabulation and
descriptive were included in Data analysis. The level of significance was set at <0.05.
Results: This study revealed that the most common shade recorded was A2 (45%), followed by B2 (20%) and A3 (10%).
Younger patients had lighter tooth shades. Shades were darker with increasing age. The most common shade selected in age
group I and group II was A2 which were represented as 52.8% and 52.9% respectively. Among males, the most common shade
was A2 (47.6%), followed by B2 (19.5%) and A3 (15.9%) whereas in females most common shade was A2 (43.2%), followed
by B2 (20.3%) and A1 (10.2%).
Conclusion: This study concluded that the tooth shade selection was strongly associated with both age and gender. Most
common classical shade selected was A2. Shades were darker with the advancing age. Women’s teeth were lighter than the
men’s. This information can be effective for fabrication of more life-like prosthesis.

References

Elamin HO, Abubakr NH. Identifying the tooth shade in group of patients using Vita Easyshade. European J Dent 2015; 9(2): 213-17

Veeraganta SK, Savadi RC . Differences in tooth shade value according to age, gender and skin color: A pilot study. J Ind Prosth Societ. 2015; 15(2): 138-41

Mayekar SM. Shades of a color. Illusion or reality? Dent Clin North Am. 2001; 45: 155-72

Rodrigues S, Shetty SR. An evaluation of shade differences between natural anterior teeth in different age groups and gender using commercially available shade guides. J Ind Prostho Aoc. 2012; 12(4): 222- 30

Azad AA, Ahmad S.Relationship of age, gender and skin tone to shades off permanent maxillary central incisors. Pak Oral Dent J. 1999; 27(1): 119 -25

Hassan AK. Effect of age on colour of dentition of Baghdad patients. East Mediterr Health J. 2001; 6:511-3

O Oluwole DB, Elizabeth D. Relationship between tooth colour, skin colour and age: An observational study in patients at the Ibadan Dental School. Afr J Biomed Res. 2010; 13(1): 9-14

Park JH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96:402-11

American Dental Association. Dental shade guides. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:366-7

Dagg H, O’Connell B, Claffey N. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;22:900-4

Awinashe VN, Dugad JA. Effects of light intensity on the shade selection in ceramic restorations - A survey. Inter J Dent Clin. 2010; 2(3): 23-6

Ho C, Syd B, Dent G. Shade selection. Austr Dent Pract. 2007; 116-8

Curd F, Jasinevicius T, Graves A . Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(6):391-6

Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: A review of the literature.Br Dent J. 2001; 190: 309-16

Jahangiri L, Reinhardt SB, Mehra RV. Relationship between tooth shade value and skin color: An observa- tional study. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:149-52

Joiner A. Tooth colour: A review of the literature. J Dent. 2004;32:3-12

Esan TA, Olusile AO, Akeredolu PA. Factors influencing tooth shade selection for completely edentulous patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:80-7

Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:418-23

Hasegawa A, Motonomi A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color of natural tooth crown in Japanese people. Color Res Appl. 2000;25:43-8

Frush JP, Fisher RD. The age factor in dentogenics. J Prosthet Dent. 1957;7:5-13

Analoui M, Papkosta E. Designing visually optimal shade guides. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:371-6

Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW . Evaluationof visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent.1998;80:642-8

Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ, Lua MJR. Interdepen- denceof the hue, value, and chroma in the middle site of anterior human teeth. J Prosthod. 1994;3:188-92

Hartmann R, Muller F. Clinical studies on the appearance of natural anterior teeth in young and old adults. Gerodontol 2004;21:10-6

Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiber-optic calorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:535-42

Guo H, Wang F, Feng H, Gou X .The investigation of color selection of 4340 cases of ceramic restorations. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi XueZaZhi. 2000;18:174-7

Downloads

Published

2017-03-06

How to Cite

Memon, F. ., Khatri, D. R. ., Memon, S. ., & Mirza, D. . (2017). An Assessment of the Shade Differences in the Anterior Teeth According to the Age and Gender, Using Commercially Available Shade Guide. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 7(1), 14–18. Retrieved from https://jbumdc.bahria.edu.pk/index.php/ojs/article/view/219

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>