Prevalence Of Partial Edentulism, Complete Edentulism And Single Complete Opposing Partial Edentulism In Relation To The Age Groups And Gender In The Local Population Of Hyderabad

Authors

  • Farzana Memon
  • Diya Ram Khatri
  • Daud Mirza
  • Salwa Memon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2018007

Keywords:

Partial edentulism, complete edentulism, prevalence, age, gender

Abstract

ABSTRACT:
Objective: This study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of partial edentulism, complete edentulism and
complete edentulous arch opposing the partial edentulous arches in relation to the various age groups and gender in
local population of Hyderabad.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Prosthodontic, Isra Dental
College, Hyderabad. Duration of the study was 6 months, from January 2016 to June, 2016. A total 504 patients were
selected for this study on the basis of history and clinical examination. The selected subjects were divided into six
age groups. Data was statistically analysed by SPSS statistics software version 21. Descriptive statistics such as
frequencies, percentages, mean and cross tabulation were applied to test the variables. The level of statistical significance
was set to 0.5%.
Results: The results showed that out of 504 selected subjects 426 (84.5%) subjects were partially edentulous, as
compared to completely edentulous patients who numbered only 66 (13.1%) whereas 7 (1.4%) subjects had complete
edentulous upper ridge and partially edentulous lower ridge, only 5 (1%) subjects had complete edentulous lower ridge
and partially edentulous upper ridge. Partially edentulous jaws were more prevalent in females and in middle aged
patients ranging from 31-40 years and completely edentulous jaws were more prevalent among male subjects in old
age subjects who were above 60 years of age. Single complete denture opposing partially edentulous ridges were more
common in females and in patients who were above 30 years of age.
Conclusion: This study concluded that the partially edentulous jaws were more prevalent as compared to completely
edentulous jaws. Partially edentulous jaws were more prevalent in females and in middle aged patients while completely
edentulous jaws were more prevalent among male subjects and in old age subjects of either age, whereas single
complete denture opposing partially edentulous ridges were more common in females and in patients who were above
30 years of age.

References

Shimazaki Y, Soh I, Koga T, Miyazaki H et al. Risk factors for tooth loss in the institutionalised elderly; a six-year cohort study: Community Dent Health. 2003;20(2):123- 7.

Marcelo C B, Jefferson T et al, Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3(4):393-397.

Käyser AF. Shortened dental arches and oral function. J OralRehabil. 1981;8:457-62.

Ariga P, Bridgitte A, Rangarajan V et al. Edentulousness, denture wear and denture needs of the elderly in rural south India. Iran J Publ Health. 2012; 41(7): 40-43.

Yu KT, Mark SG. Is tooth loss good or bad for general health>Int J Epidmiol. 2005; 34: 475-76.

Muller F, Natharro M et al. What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007; 18(3): 2-14.

McGrath C and Bedi R. Severe tooth loss among UK adults- who goes for oral rehabilitation? Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2002; 29(3): 240–44.

Dolan TA, Gilbert GH, Duncan RP et al.Risk indicators of edentulism, partial tooth loss and prostheticstatus among

black and white middle-aged and older adults.Com Dent Oral Epidem. 2001; 29(5): 329–40.

Sonkesariya S, Jain D, Shakya P et al. Prevalence ofdentulism, partial edentulism and complete edentulism in rural and urban population of Malwa region of India: A population based study. Int J ProsthoRestor Dent. 2014; 4(4): 112-19.

Kaira LS, Jain R, Kukreja H et al. To study the prevalence of complete edentulousness among rural and urban population of Udaipur district of Rajasthan in relation to age and gender. Euro J Prostho. 2013; 1(1): 21-26.

Dubey RK, Gupta DK, Shetty P. Current status of edentulousness in India: Systemic review. Chhatt J Health Scie. 2013; 1(1): 72-76.

Felton DA. Edentulism and comorbid factors. J Prosthodont.2009; 18: 88-96.

Prabhu N, Kumar S, D’Souza M et al. Partialedentulousness in rural population based on Kennedy’sclassification: An epidemiological study. J IndProsthodontSoc. 2009; 9: 18- 23.

Takala L, Utr iainen P, Alanen P. Incidence of edentulousness,reasons for full clearance and health status of teeth beforeextractions in rural Finland. Com Dent Oral Epide. 1994;22:254-7.

Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Social impact of oral conditions amongolder adults. Aust Dent J. 1994; 39: 358-64.

Susin C, Oppermann RV, Haugejorden O et al. Tooth loss and associated risk indicators in an adult urbanpopulation from South Brazil.ActaOdontoScandi. 2005; 63(2): 85–93.

Kaira LS and Dabral E. Prevalnace of complete edentulism among Udaipur population of India. Saud J Dent Resea. 2014; 5: 139-45.

Khazaei S, Keshteli AH et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of tooth loss among Iranian adults: Community based study. Biomed Res Int J. 2013; 1-8.

Sanders AE, Slade GD, Carter KD et al. Trendsin prevalence of complete tooth loss among Australians, 1979–2002. Austra New Zea J Pub Health. 2004; 28(6): 549–54.

Fure S andZickert I. Prevalence of root surface caries in 55, 65 and 75-year-old Swedish individuals. Com Dent OralEpid. 1990;18:100-5.

Hunt RJ, Beck JD, Lemke JH et al.Edentulism and oral health problems among elderly ruralIowans: The Iowa 65+rural health study. Am J Publ Health. 1985;75(10):1177-81.

XieQ and Ainamo A. Association of edentulousness with systemicfactors in elderly people living at home. Commun Dent OralEpidemiol. 1999;27:202–9.

Sakki TK, Knuuttila ML et al.Association of lifestyle with periodontal health. CommuDent Oral Epidemiol. 1995; 23: 155-8.

Hessari H, Vehkalahti MM et al.Tooth loss and prosthodontic rehabilitation among 35- to 44 year-old Iranians. J Oral Rehab. 2008; 35(4):245–51.

Okoro CA, Balluz LS et al. Tooth loss and heartdisease: findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillancesystem. Ameri J Preven Med. 2005; 29(5): 50–56.

Ettinger RL, Beck JD, Jakobsen J. Removable prosthodontics treatment needs: A survey. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51: 419- 27.

Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP, Zemp E et al. Tooth loss, dental restorations and dental attendance in Switzerland. SchweizMonatsschrZahnmed. 2001; 111(11): 1288–94.

Khazaei S, Firouzei MS, Sadeghpour S et al. Edentulism and tooth Loss in Iran: SEPAHAN systematic review no. 6. Interna J PrevenMedi. 2012; 3(1): 42–47.

WHO. The world oral health report 2003. Available from

/ report03/ en/ prlnternational.html.

Shetty P, Bhargava K, Goel P et al. Edentulousness and prosthetic needs of a rural population in southern India. J Indi Prostho Soc. 2001; 1: 20-25.

Angelillo IF, Sagliocco G, Hendricks SJH et al. Tooth loss and Dental cariesin institutionalized elderly in Italy. CommDent Oral Epidemiol.1990; 18: 216-18

Downloads

Published

2018-03-05

How to Cite

Memon, F. ., Khatri, D. R. ., Mirza, D. ., & Memon, S. . (2018). Prevalence Of Partial Edentulism, Complete Edentulism And Single Complete Opposing Partial Edentulism In Relation To The Age Groups And Gender In The Local Population Of Hyderabad. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 8(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2018007

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): Volume 8 Issue 1

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Farzana Memon, Diya Ram Khatri, Daud Mirza, Salwa Memon

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>