Indications of Primary Cesarean Section In Multipara

Authors

  • Shazia Aftab
  • Nazish Ali
  • Fehmida Saleh
  • Saira Ghafoor Ghafoor
  • Aasha Mahesh
  • Sheena Memon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2018117

Keywords:

cessarean section rate, indications of cessarean section, multiparous.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the indications of primary cesarean section in multipara and to assess the obstetric outcome including
maternal, fetal morbidity and mortality, perinatal outcome.
Study Design and Setting: It was a hospital based study of primary caesarean sections (CS) done on multiparous patients
in duration of two years between January 1, 2016, and December 2017 at Jinnah medical college hospital Karachi.
Methodology: Multiparous patients were those who had delivered through vaginal route one or more times (i.e. 28 weeks
of gestation or above) or had 1–4children and grand-multiparous are those who had 5 or more children. All the cases
included in the study were hospital based and cesarean section was decided by specialist. The procedure was performed
by registrars and specialists. The selected patients were followed up till they were discharge from the ward with minimum
hospital stay of three days. Data was compiled and results were carried out by SPSS version 23.
Results: During the two years of study period, the number of total deliveries were 2064. The primary CS rate in multipara
was 37.17%. These women have more likely to have an emergency cessarean sections compared to elective i.e. 85%
and15%. The mean age of women was 29.5 years, booked cases were 72.5% and unbooked were 27.5%. Regarding
indications for cesarean sections, non-progress of labour ranked first 25.5% followed by fetal distress 20%, pre eclampsia
12 % and ante partum hemorrhage 10.5% etc. Increase incidence of morbidity and mortality was seen in patients undergoing
cesarean section due to different reasons.
Conclusion: Primary caesarean sections in multipara comprise only a small percentage (37.17%) of total deliveries but
were related to high maternal and fetal morbidity.

References

Sethi P, Vijaylaxmi S,Shailaja G, Bodhare T, Devi S. A study of primary cesarean section in multigravidae. Perspectives in medical research 2014; 2:3-7.

Boruff, K.Health grades revealsc section rates across America. 2012. Available from: http://www.healthgrades.com/ratings-and-awards/national-maternity-care Downloaded 12.02.2013.

Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006, 367:1819–1829.

Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group: Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 2010, 375:490–499.

Monitta Moni et al A study on obstetric profile of mothers undergoing primary caesarean section and their neonatal outcome in a tertiary care centre, South Kerala. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research 2015; 6(12): 835-838.

Meha Agrawal1, Supriya Waydande Frequency and indications of primary caesarean section hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, INDIA. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science And Technology, 2016;18(3):430-432.

Haider G, Zehra N, Munir AA, Haider A. Frequency and indication of caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci: 2009; 25(5): 791-796.

Shamshad. Factors leading to increased caesarean section rate. Gomal J Med Sci: 2008: (1): 1-5.

Dr. J.K.Saluja, Dr P K Roy, Dr. K. Mahadik Assoc Prof, Prof. R.D. Study of Primary Caesarean Section In Multiparous Women, Gardi Medical College, Ujjain NJIRM 2014; 5(2):

Akinola et al. Caesarean section – an appraisal of some predictive factors in Lagos Nigeria BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:217

Namrata Saxena, Bhawna Sharma, Vineeta Gupta, Kamal S. Negi. A six year appraisal of caesarean delivery at a teaching hospital in Uttarakhand . Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(12):4369-72.

KhawajaNP, Yousaf T, Tayyeb R: Analysis of caesarean delivery at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. J ObstetGynaec 2004, 24:139–141.

Najmi SR, Renan N: Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in a teaching hospital in Pakistan. J Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 20(5):479–483.

OlusanyaBO, Solanke OA: Maternal and neonatal factors associated with mode of delivery under a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009, 9:41.

Dr. G .Partha Saradhi Reddy, Dr.S.VenkataRamana, Dr. Salma Bhanu. Clinical Study of Primary Caesarean Section in Multiparous Women. Indian Journal Of Research 2015;4(10):

Tita AT: When is primary cesarean appropriate: maternal and obstetrical indications. SeminPerinatol 2012, 36:324–327.

SahaL, Chowdhury SB: Study on primary cesarean section. Mymensingh Med J 2011, 20:292–297.

Boyle A et al. Primary caesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol 2013;122:33-40.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-05

How to Cite

Aftab, S. ., Ali, N. ., Saleh, F. ., Ghafoor, S. G., Mahesh, A. ., & Memon, S. . (2019). Indications of Primary Cesarean Section In Multipara. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 9(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2018117

Issue

Section

Original Articles