Comparison of Performance of Risk Assessment Tools for Low BMD and Fracture Risk Identification in Pakistani Women

Authors

  • Madeeha Sadiq
  • Kevin Borges
  • Sajid Sattar
  • Nuzhat Hassan
  • Rubina Hussain
  • Hina Naeem

Keywords:

Bone Mineral Density, Pakistan, Prediction, Risk Assessment tools, Screening

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of four risk assessment tools for identifying low Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in a sample
of Pakistani females.
Methodology: It was a cross sectional study including 200 females above 40 years. DXA scans were performed. Subjects were
categorized into low risk and high risk categories for low BMD on the basis of T scores. Questionnaires were filled and risk
indices were calculated for all subjects. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated, Receiver
Operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and Area Under Curve (AUC) were obtained.
Results: A total of 200 females including 174(87%) postmenopausal, and 26(13%) premenopausal were included. Average age
was 60.76±10.52 years with average age of menopause being 47.64±6.63 years. In terms of sensitivity, specificity and AUC,
the WHO risk assessment tool FRAX showed the best performance with a sensitivity of 79%, specificity 94% and AUC of
0.869 for detecting low BMD.
Conclusion: It is not cost effective to use DXA for screening purposes. We propose that risk assessment tools such as FRAX
may be utilized to identify individuals with low BMD. This may prove beneficial in minimizing the medical and social burden
that fragility fractures pose to developing health care systems.

References

Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease, Professional Edition: Expert Consult-Online: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. (8):236-7

Tufail A, Naheed F, Parveen S, Zahidie F, Sultana A. Osteoporosis In Women. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International). 2015; 20(2): 52-5

Koh G-H, Tai B, Ang L-W, Heng D, Yuan J-M, Koh W-P. All-cause and cause-specific mortality after hip fracture among Chinese women and men. Osteoporosis international. 2013;24(7):1981-9

Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, Jaatinen P, Vah- lberg T, Aarnio P, et al. Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older-a population- based study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2011;12 (1):105-11

Mithal A, Kaur P. Osteoporosis in Asia: a call to action. Current osteoporosis reports. 2012;10(4):245-7

Mithal A, Dhingra V, Lau E, Stenmark J, Nauroy L. The Asian Audit: epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Asia 2009. China: International Osteop- orosis Foundation (IOF) Publication. 2009. Available from:https://www.iofbonehealth .org/sites/default/files /PDFs/Audit%20Asia/Asian_regional_audit_2009.pdf

Habib S, Iqbal R, Shahid M, Habib A. Growing preval- ence of osteoporosis in Pakistan: Call for action. JPMA

.2015;65(2):230-1

Mithal A, Ebeling P, Kyer C. The Asia-Pacific regional audit: epidemiology, costs, and burden of osteoporosis in 2013. International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon. 2013. :Available from: https://www.iofbonehealth.org

/sites/default/files/media/PDFs/Regional%20Audits/ 2013-Asia_Pacific_Audit_0_0.pdf

Amarnath ALD, Franks P, Robbins JA, Xing G, Fenton JJ. Underuse and overuse of osteoporosis screening in a regional health system: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of general internal medicine. 2015;30(12):1733-40

Koh L, Sedrine WB, Torralba T, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan S, et al. A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis international. 2001; 12(8): 699-705

Salaffi F, Silveri F, Stancati A, Grassi W. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Clinical rheum- atology. 2005;24(3):203-11

Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Friis-Holmberg T, Hjelmborg JV, Bech M, Hermann AP, et al. Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study. Bone. 2013;56(1):16-22

Chan S-P, Teo C, Ng S, Goh N, Tan C, Deurenberg-Yap

M. Validation of various osteoporosis risk indices in elderly Chinese females in Singapore. Osteoporosis international. 2006;17(8):1182-8

Muslim D, Mohd E, Sallehudin A, Muzaffar TT, Ezane A. Performance of Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asian (OSTA) for Primary Osteoporosis in Post-menopausal Malay Women. Malaysian orthopaedic journal. 2012;6(1):35

Chao AS, Chen FP, Lin YC, Huang TS, Fan CM, Yu YW. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;54(6):722-5

Kanis J. Commentary on guidelines on postmenopaus- al osteoporosis-Indian Menopause Society. Journal of mid-life health. 2013;4(2):129

NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention D, Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285(6):785-95

Lorentzon M, Cummings S. Osteoporosis: the evolu- tion of a diagnosis. Journal of internal medicine.2015; 277(6):650-61

McCloskey E, Kanis JA. FRAX updates 2012. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2012;24(5):554-60

Ranyah Hamdy M, Afify M. The Validity of four Osteoporosis Risk Indices in Identifying Low Bone Mass Density in Egyptian Postmenopausal Women. Egyptian Journal of Community Medicine. 2011;29(3): 63-75

Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL, Ensrud KE, Bauer DC, et al. WHO absolute fracture risk models (FRAX): do clinical risk factors improve fracture prediction in older women without osteoporosis? Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2011;26(8):1774-82

Yingyuenyong S. Validation of FRAX® WHO Fractu- re Risk Assessment Tool with and without the Alara Metriscan Phalangeal Densitometer as a Screening Tool to Identify Osteoporosis in Thai Postmenopausal Women. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;20(3):111-120

Dabbaghmanesh MH, Sabet R, Aria A, Omrani GR. Performance of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in Iranian postmenopausal women. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;1:26-32

Patel SM, Jadhav PR, Vieira A. Association of OSTA index with bone mineral density (BMD) and its comparison with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of low BMD in peri-menopausal Indian women. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2017;2(4):1495-9

McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, Naylor CD, Stiell IG, Richardson WS, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. JAMA. 2000;284(1):79-84

Rubin KH, Friis-Holmberg T, Hermann AP, Abraham- sen B, Brixen K. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2013;28(8):1701-17

Yang Y, Wang B, Fei Q, Meng Q, Li D, Tang H, et al. Validation of an osteoporosis self-assessment tool to identify primary osteoporosis and new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women in Beijing. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2013;14(1):271-9

Pang WY, Inderjeeth CA. FRAX without Bone Mineral Density Versus Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Screening Tool as Predictors of Osteoporosis in Primary Screening of Individuals Aged 70 and Older. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2014;62(3):442-6

Delialioglu S, Kaya K, Ozisler Z, Ozel S. Performance of risk assessment indices for the prediction of postmen- opausal osteoporosis [Türkisch]. Osteoporoz Dünyasindan 2009;15(1):21-5

Downloads

Published

2017-06-05

How to Cite

Sadiq, M. ., Borges, K. ., Sattar, S. ., Hassan, N. ., Hussain, R. ., & Naeem, H. . (2017). Comparison of Performance of Risk Assessment Tools for Low BMD and Fracture Risk Identification in Pakistani Women. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 7(2), 107–113. Retrieved from https://jbumdc.bahria.edu.pk/index.php/ojs/article/view/246

Issue

Section

Original Articles