Correlation of the Camper Planes with Respect to Occlusal Plane in Prosthodontic Rehabilitation

Authors

  • Muhammad Haseeb Rana
  • Gotam Das
  • Naveed Innayat
  • Nadia Munir
  • Khawaja Rashid Hassan

Keywords:

Camper’s Plane, Occlusal Plane, Prosthodontic Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To measure the mean camper planes I, II and III with reference to the occlusal plane to determine the smallest angle
in Prosthodontic rehabilitation.
Methodology: This study was carried out in the department of Prosthodontics, de’ Montmorency College of Dentistry and
Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore from 19th May to 18th November 2012. Total 50 patients were included. Cephalometric radiographs
were taken. On Cephalogram angles were measured between Camper’s I, II, and III with occlusal plane. All measurements
were calculated and data analysis was done by using SPSS version 17.
Result:Mean Camper plane I-OP was 1.670±0.94, Camper plane II-OP was 2.600±1.07 and mean for Camper plane III-OP was
3.60o±1.19.
Conclusion: According to this study, angle between Camper’s I (superior border of the tragus to the lowest point of ala) was
most precise in orienting the occlusal plane.

References

Jayachandran S, Ramachandran C, Varghese R. Occlusal plane orientation: a statistical and clinical analysis in different clinical situations. J Prosthodont 2008;17(7): 572-5

Sadr K, Sadr M. A study of parallelism of the occlusal plane and ala-tragus line. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2009;3(4):107

Singh G. Ala Tragus Line–A Cephalometric Evaluation. Int J Prosthet Dent 2010;1(1):1-5

Petricevic N, Guberina M, Celic R, Mehulic K, Krajnovic M, Antonic R, et al. Use of digital photography in the reconstruction of the occlusal plane orientation. Med Glas. 2009;6(2):243-8

Quran FAA, Hazza’a A, Nahass NA. The position of the occlusal plane in natural and artificial dentitions as related to other craniofacial planes. J Prosthodont 2010; 19(8):601-5

McCord JF, Grant AA. A clinical guide to complete denture prosthetics: Evid Based Dent; 2000

Lundström F, Lundström A. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop American 1992;101(3):244-7

Lundquist DO, Luther WW. Occlusal plane determina- tion. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1970;23(5):489

Ismail YH, Bowman JF. Position of the occlusal plane in natural and artificial teeth. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1968;20(5):407-11

Karkazis H, Polyzois G, Zissis A. Relationship between Ala-tragus line and natural occlusal plane. Implications in denture prosthodontics. Quintessence Int 1986;17:253- 5

Nagle RJ, Sears VH. Denture prosthetics; complete dentures: Mosby; 1962

Monteith BD. A cephalometric method to determine the angulation of the occlusal plane in edentulous patients. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1985;54(1):81

L'Estrange PR, Vig PS. A comparative study of the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1975;33(5):495-503

D'Souza NL, Bhargava K. A cephalometric study comparing the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects in relation to the maxillomandibular space. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1996;75(2):177-82

Merkeley HJ. The labial and buccal accessory muscles of mastication. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1954;4(3):327-34

Abrahams R, Carey P. The use of the ala-tragus line for occlusal plane determination in complete dentures. Journal of dentistry 1979;7(4):339-41

Celebic A, Valenticcar-Peruzovic M, Kraljevic K, Brkic

H. A study of the occlusal plane orientation by intra- oral method (retromolar pad). Journal of Oral Rehabili- tation 1995;22(3):233-6

Fu Ps, Hung CC, Hong JM, Wang JC. Three dimensional analysis of the occlusal plane related to the hamular- incisive-papilla occlusal plane in young adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2007;34(2):136-40

Lundquist DO, Luther WW. Occlusal plane determina- tion. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1970;23(5):489

Karkazis H, Polyzois G, Zissis A. Retastionship between Ala-tragus line and natural occlusal plane. Implications in denture prosthodontice. Quintessence Int. 1986; 17: 253-5

Levin B, Sauer JL. Results of a survey of complete denture procedures taught in American and Canadian dental schools. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1969;22(2):171-7

Ukai H, Yanagide S, Ratoh Y. Examination into the questionnaire,“Results of a survey of complete denture procedures taught in Japanese dental schools”. Prac Prosthod 1979;3:324

Nissan J, Barnea E, Zeltzer C, Cardash H. Relationship between the craniofacial complex and size of the resorbed mandible in complete denture wearers. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2003;30(12):1173-6

Augsburger RH. Occlusal plane relation to facial type. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1953;3(6):755-70

Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL. Cephalometrically predicted occlusal plane: implications in removable prosthodontics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1991;65(2):258-64

Van Niekerk F, Miller V, Bibby R. The ala-tragus line in complete denture prosthodontics. The Journal of prosthetic dent 1985;53(1):67

Downloads

Published

2017-03-06

How to Cite

Rana, M. H. ., Das, G. ., Innayat, N. ., Munir, N. ., & Hassan, K. R. . (2017). Correlation of the Camper Planes with Respect to Occlusal Plane in Prosthodontic Rehabilitation. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 7(1), 36–39. Retrieved from https://jbumdc.bahria.edu.pk/index.php/ojs/article/view/225

Issue

Section

Original Articles