Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates Using Robson Ten Group Classification System in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar: A Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2024381Keywords:
Primigravida, Caesarean Section, Abruptio Placentae, Multipara, Placenta Accreta How to cite this ArticlAbstract
Objective: To observe CS rates and assess them using Robson's Ten Groups Categorization System in a government tertiary medical facility in Peshawar, Pakistan
Study Design and Setting: From 1st March to 31st August 2023, a cross-sectional study was carried out at the Khyber Teaching Hospital’s department of obstetrics and gynecology in Peshawar, Pakistan
Methodology:. The research cohort consisted of 1250 women with CS who were hospitalized throughout the specified study period. Information on maternal features and pregnancy-related details was collected for every patient.
Results: 4227 women sought labor and delivery services during the course of the research. It was discovered that the CS rate was 29.5%. Most common were Groups 1 (7.57%), 3 (8.65%), and 5 (54.66%), which together accounted for around 69% of all CS occurrences. Group 5's CS rate was 80.7%, but subgroup 5.1's (previous CS) women experienced repeat CS at a rate of 65.14%. 95% babies were alive and 5% were stillborns.
Conclusion: Noticeable raise in the caesarean deliveries rate, leading to substantial worse influence in terms of health, finances, and society. Previous CS is the most prevalent sign of CS.CS if performed on primigravidae with a valid indication, the rate of CS may be managed.
References
Khasawneh W, Obeidat N, Yusef D, Alsulaiman JW. The
impact of cesarean section on neonatal outcomes at a universitybased tertiary hospital in Jordan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
;20(1):335. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03027-2
Wahane A, Ghaisas AS. Analysis of caesarean sections according to Robson’s criteria at a tertiary care teaching hospital in
central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol.
;9:4221-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-
ijrcog20204317
Pasokpuckdee K, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Incidence of preeclampsia and cesarean section Rate according to the Robson
classification. Cureus. 2022;15(12): e49845. doi:
7759/cureus.49845
Syed S, Kalsoom T, Batool I, Naheed N, Malik U, Nawaz S.
Use of Robson’s Ten Group Classification System to Optimize
Caesarean Section Rate; An Audit in a Tertiary Care Centre,
Rawalpindi.J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2023; 13(3):241-246.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5.
FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and
Infants during Labour and Delivery. Best practice advice on
the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries.
International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics. 2016;135(2)
:232–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001
Visser G, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea E, de Bernis L, Di
Renzo G, Vidarte M, Lloyd I, Nassar A, Nicholson W, Shah
P. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section
epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286–7.DOI: 10.1016/
S0140-6736(18)32113-5
Sah S, Goel R, Goel JK. Analysis of caesarean section rate
according to Robson’s criteria in tertiary care centre. International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics
Gynecology. 2018;7(8):3060–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/
18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182947
Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I,
Gure T, Stekelenburg J. Analysis of caesarean sections using
Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital
in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018
Apr 4;8(4):e020520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020520.
PMID: 29622577; PMCID: PMC5892782.
Hanson C, Betrán AP, Opondo C, Mkumbo E, Manzi F,
Mbaruku G, Schellenberg J. Trends in caesarean section rates
between 2007 and 2013 in obstetric risk groups inspired by
the Robson classification: results from population-based
surveys in a low-resource setting. BJOG. 2019 May;126
(6):690-700. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15534. Epub 2018 Nov
PMID: 30461161.
Tognon F, Borghero A, Putoto G, Maziku D, Torelli GF,
Azzimonti G, Betran AP. Analysis of caesarean section and
neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural
district hospital in Tanzania: an observational retrospective
study. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e033348. doi: 10.1136/
bmjopen-2019-033348. PMID: 31822545; PMCID: PMC69-
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros
FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, de
Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology
of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018
Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)
-7. PMID: 30322584.
Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi:
12669/pjms.37.2.3823. PMID: 33679951; PMCID:
PMC7931279.
Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang YH. Rising trends and
inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: Evidence
from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-
PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186563. https://doi.org /10.
/journal.pone.0186563
Sumankuuro J, Crockett J, Wang S. Perceived barriers to
maternal and newborn health services delivery: a qualitative
study of health workers and community members in low and
middle-income settings. BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):
e021223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021223. PMID:
; PMCID: PMC6231574.
Khan MA, Sohail I, Habib M. Auditing the cesarean section
rate by robson’s ten group classification system at tertiary
care hospital. Professional Med J. 2020;27(4):700-706.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.04.3383
Amin N, Malik NJ. Role of antenatal checkup on caesarean
section rate – study at CMH Attock. Pak Armed Forces
Med J. 2017;67(4):599-603. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15534
Jiandani F, Somalwar S, Bhalerao A. Frequency of Caesarean
Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification
System: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41091.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.41091
Gilani S, Mazhar SB, Zafar M, Mazhar T. The modified
Robson criteria for Caesarean Section audit at Mother and
Child Health Center Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Islamabad. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Feb;70(2):299-303. doi:
5455/JPMA.293708. PMID: 32063624.
Bello OO, Agboola AD. Utilizing the Robson 10-Group
Classification System as an Audit Tool in Assessing the
Soaring Caesarean Section Rates in Ibadan, Nigeria. J West
Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;12(1):64-69. doi: 10.4103/jwas
.jwas_43_22. Epub 2022 Aug 23. PMID: 36203917; PMCID:
PMC9531747.
Chauhan RC. Analysis of caesarean sections according to
Robson’s ten group classification system at a tertiary care
teaching hospital in South India. Int J Reprod Contracept
Obstet Gynecol 2015;4:745-749. DOI: https://doi.org/
18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150085
1 . Shtainmetz N, Tesler R, Sharon C, Korn L. Optimizing
caesarean section use and feasibility of implementing the
Robson classification system: Perspectives of healthcare
providers and policymakers. SAGE Open Med. 2024 Mar
;12:20503121241237447. doi: 10.1177/ 205031212 4123-
PMID: 38533202; PMCID: PMC10964469.
Janani L, Christina S, Akoijam BS, Nameirakpam D, Laiphrakpam RS. Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications
using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.
Indian J Public Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):434-438. doi:
4103/ijph.ijph_1928_21. PMID: 37039169.
Gautam P, Karki C, Adhikari A. Robson's Group 2 Criteria
among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital:
A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med
Assoc. 2021 Nov 15;59(243):1098-1101. doi: 10.31729 /jnma.
Mar 13;14(3):e23133
4 . Gutiérrez-Martínez S, Fernández-Martínez MN, AdánezGarcía JM, Fernández-Fernández C, Pérez-Prieto B, GarcíaGallego A, Gómez-Salgado J, Medina-Díaz M, FernándezGarcía D. Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital. Journal of Clinical
Medicine. 2024; 13(1):252. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/
jcm13010252
Hassan L, Woodbury L, Jamal N. Examining the Efficacy of
the Robson Classification System for Optimizing Cesarean
Section Rates in South Asia. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae
;12(6):366–371. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maimoona Qadir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0