Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates Using Robson Ten Group Classification System in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Maimoona Qadir

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2024381

Keywords:

Primigravida, Caesarean Section, Abruptio Placentae, Multipara, Placenta Accreta How to cite this Articl

Abstract

Objective: To observe CS rates and assess them using Robson's Ten Groups Categorization System in a government tertiary medical facility in Peshawar, Pakistan

 

Study Design and Setting: From 1st March to 31st August 2023, a cross-sectional study was carried out at the Khyber Teaching Hospital’s department of obstetrics and gynecology in Peshawar, Pakistan

 

Methodology:. The research cohort consisted of 1250 women with CS who were hospitalized throughout the specified study period. Information on maternal features and pregnancy-related details was collected for every patient.

 

Results: 4227 women sought labor and delivery services during the course of the research. It was discovered that the CS rate was 29.5%. Most common were Groups 1 (7.57%), 3 (8.65%), and 5 (54.66%), which together accounted for around 69% of all CS occurrences. Group 5's CS rate was 80.7%, but subgroup 5.1's (previous CS) women experienced repeat CS at a rate of 65.14%. 95% babies were alive and 5% were stillborns.

 

Conclusion: Noticeable raise in the caesarean deliveries rate, leading to substantial worse influence in terms of health, finances, and society. Previous CS is the most prevalent sign of CS.CS if performed on primigravidae with a valid indication, the rate of CS may be managed.

References

Khasawneh W, Obeidat N, Yusef D, Alsulaiman JW. The

impact of cesarean section on neonatal outcomes at a universitybased tertiary hospital in Jordan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.

;20(1):335. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03027-2

Wahane A, Ghaisas AS. Analysis of caesarean sections according to Robson’s criteria at a tertiary care teaching hospital in

central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol.

;9:4221-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-

ijrcog20204317

Pasokpuckdee K, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Incidence of preeclampsia and cesarean section Rate according to the Robson

classification. Cureus. 2022;15(12): e49845. doi:

7759/cureus.49845

Syed S, Kalsoom T, Batool I, Naheed N, Malik U, Nawaz S.

Use of Robson’s Ten Group Classification System to Optimize

Caesarean Section Rate; An Audit in a Tertiary Care Centre,

Rawalpindi.J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2023; 13(3):241-246.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5.

FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and

Infants during Labour and Delivery. Best practice advice on

the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries.

International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics. 2016;135(2)

:232–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001

Visser G, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea E, de Bernis L, Di

Renzo G, Vidarte M, Lloyd I, Nassar A, Nicholson W, Shah

P. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section

epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286–7.DOI: 10.1016/

S0140-6736(18)32113-5

Sah S, Goel R, Goel JK. Analysis of caesarean section rate

according to Robson’s criteria in tertiary care centre. International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics

Gynecology. 2018;7(8):3060–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/

18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182947

Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I,

Gure T, Stekelenburg J. Analysis of caesarean sections using

Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital

in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018

Apr 4;8(4):e020520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020520.

PMID: 29622577; PMCID: PMC5892782.

Hanson C, Betrán AP, Opondo C, Mkumbo E, Manzi F,

Mbaruku G, Schellenberg J. Trends in caesarean section rates

between 2007 and 2013 in obstetric risk groups inspired by

the Robson classification: results from population-based

surveys in a low-resource setting. BJOG. 2019 May;126

(6):690-700. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15534. Epub 2018 Nov

PMID: 30461161.

Tognon F, Borghero A, Putoto G, Maziku D, Torelli GF,

Azzimonti G, Betran AP. Analysis of caesarean section and

neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural

district hospital in Tanzania: an observational retrospective

study. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e033348. doi: 10.1136/

bmjopen-2019-033348. PMID: 31822545; PMCID: PMC69-

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros

FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, de

Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology

of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018

Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)

-7. PMID: 30322584.

Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.

Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi:

12669/pjms.37.2.3823. PMID: 33679951; PMCID:

PMC7931279.

Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang YH. Rising trends and

inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: Evidence

from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-

PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186563. https://doi.org /10.

/journal.pone.0186563

Sumankuuro J, Crockett J, Wang S. Perceived barriers to

maternal and newborn health services delivery: a qualitative

study of health workers and community members in low and

middle-income settings. BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):

e021223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021223. PMID:

; PMCID: PMC6231574.

Khan MA, Sohail I, Habib M. Auditing the cesarean section

rate by robson’s ten group classification system at tertiary

care hospital. Professional Med J. 2020;27(4):700-706.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.04.3383

Amin N, Malik NJ. Role of antenatal checkup on caesarean

section rate – study at CMH Attock. Pak Armed Forces

Med J. 2017;67(4):599-603. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15534

Jiandani F, Somalwar S, Bhalerao A. Frequency of Caesarean

Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification

System: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41091.

doi: 10.7759/cureus.41091

Gilani S, Mazhar SB, Zafar M, Mazhar T. The modified

Robson criteria for Caesarean Section audit at Mother and

Child Health Center Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

Islamabad. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Feb;70(2):299-303. doi:

5455/JPMA.293708. PMID: 32063624.

Bello OO, Agboola AD. Utilizing the Robson 10-Group

Classification System as an Audit Tool in Assessing the

Soaring Caesarean Section Rates in Ibadan, Nigeria. J West

Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;12(1):64-69. doi: 10.4103/jwas

.jwas_43_22. Epub 2022 Aug 23. PMID: 36203917; PMCID:

PMC9531747.

Chauhan RC. Analysis of caesarean sections according to

Robson’s ten group classification system at a tertiary care

teaching hospital in South India. Int J Reprod Contracept

Obstet Gynecol 2015;4:745-749. DOI: https://doi.org/

18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150085

1 . Shtainmetz N, Tesler R, Sharon C, Korn L. Optimizing

caesarean section use and feasibility of implementing the

Robson classification system: Perspectives of healthcare

providers and policymakers. SAGE Open Med. 2024 Mar

;12:20503121241237447. doi: 10.1177/ 205031212 4123-

PMID: 38533202; PMCID: PMC10964469.

Janani L, Christina S, Akoijam BS, Nameirakpam D, Laiphrakpam RS. Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications

using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.

Indian J Public Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):434-438. doi:

4103/ijph.ijph_1928_21. PMID: 37039169.

Gautam P, Karki C, Adhikari A. Robson's Group 2 Criteria

among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital:

A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med

Assoc. 2021 Nov 15;59(243):1098-1101. doi: 10.31729 /jnma.

Mar 13;14(3):e23133

4 . Gutiérrez-Martínez S, Fernández-Martínez MN, AdánezGarcía JM, Fernández-Fernández C, Pérez-Prieto B, GarcíaGallego A, Gómez-Salgado J, Medina-Díaz M, FernándezGarcía D. Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital. Journal of Clinical

Medicine. 2024; 13(1):252. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/

jcm13010252

Hassan L, Woodbury L, Jamal N. Examining the Efficacy of

the Robson Classification System for Optimizing Cesarean

Section Rates in South Asia. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae

;12(6):366–371. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-

Downloads

Published

2024-10-08

How to Cite

Qadir, M. . (2024). Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates Using Robson Ten Group Classification System in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 14(04), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2024381

Issue

Section

Original Articles