Current Status of Neurorehabilitation Services in the OIC Countries: Results of an International Online Survey

Authors

  • Zuhaib Hassan
  • Farooq Azam Rathore
  • Sermad Mangat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2023307

Keywords:

Disability management, low middle income countries; online survey; physiotherapy; rehabilitation medicine

Abstract

Objectives: Neurorehabilitation services are not widely available to most persons with disability (PWD) in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation countries. This study aimed to document status of neurorehabilitation services in OIC countries. Study Design and Setting: Cross-sectional online survey.

 

Methods: Self-administered online survey conducted using Google Forms. Key resource persons for each OIC country working in field of neurorehabilitation were identified from various databases. The questionnaire was emailed to 20 identified resource persons. The response rate was 60% (12/20).

 

Results: Neurorehabilitation services were available in 9 out of 12 surveyed countries. Only 2 countries reported providing access to neurorehabilitation services to 76-100% of their population. Five countries reported less than 25% of population had access to these services. Most commonly available neurorehabilitation services included services for stroke, spinal cord injury, pediatric neurorehabilitation, brain injury, and neuromuscular rehabilitation. Three countries had none of these specialized services. Five countries had neurorehabilitation training programs for physicians and other rehabilitation professionals. Patients had to pay out of pocket for these services in most of surveyed countries, followed by public funding and private insurance. Tele-neurorehabilitation and local disease-specific neurorehabilitation guidelines were not available in most of surveyed countries.

 

Conclusion: Neurorehabilitation services in OIC region are not widely available, with significant variability in availability and quality. There is a need to develop and improve these services. Sharing knowledge and expertise through various forms, such as exchange visits and online sessions, can help improve neurorehabilitation services in these countries

References

Karikari TK, Charway-Felli A, Höglund K, Blennow K,

Zetterberg H. Commentary: Global, regional, and national

burden of neurological disorders during 1990-2015: a

systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study

Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 29;9:201. doi:

3389/fneur.2018.00201.

World Health Organization. Health Systems. Available from:

https://www.who.int/healthsystems/universal_health_cover

age/en/ Accessed 14th March 2024

GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and

national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a

systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study

Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):459-480. doi:

1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X.

Viruega H, Gaviria M. After 55 Years of Neurorehabilitation,

What Is the Plan? Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 26;12(8):982. doi:

3390/brainsci12080982.

World Health Organization. Assistive Devices/Technologies:

What WHO Is Doing. Available from: http://www.who.int/

disabilities/technology/activities/en/ Accessed 14th March

1.OIC IT Dept. Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Member

states [Internet]. Oic-oci.org. 2018 [cited 2023 July 24].

Available from: https://www.oic-oci.org/states/?lan=en

World Health Organization. Rehabilitation [Internet]. Who.int.

World Health Organization: WHO; 2021. Available from:

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/

rehabilitation Accessed 24 Dec 23

Department of Health and Social Care. National service

framework: long term conditions [Internet]. GOV.UK. 2005.

Available from: https://www.gov.uk/ government/ publications/

quality-standards-for-supporting-people-with-long-termconditions . Accessed 24 Dec 23

Mahboub SM, Alsaqabi AA, Allwimi NA, Aleissa DN, AlMubarak BA. Prevalence and pattern of consanguineous

marriage among educated married individuals in Riyadh. J

Biosoc Sci. 2020 Sep;52(5):768-775. doi: 10.1017/

S0021932019000786.

El-Kheshen G, Saadat M. Prevalence of consanguineous

marriages among shi'a populations of Lebanon. J Biosoc Sci.

Sep;45(5):675-82. doi: 10.1017/S0021932012000843.

ISPRM. Assembly of Delegates – ISPRM Updated 6th Jul

[Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec24]. Available from:

https://isprm.org/discover/assembly-of-delegates/

Member Societies [Internet]. www.wfnr.co.uk. [cited 2023

July 24]. Available from: https://www.wfnr.co.uk/membersocieties/member-societies

Barclay L, Lalor A, Migliorini C, Robins L. A comparative

examination of models of service delivery intended to support

community integration in the immediate period following

inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord.

May;58(5):528-536. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0394-x.

Geberemichael SG, Tannor AY, Asegahegn TB, Christian AB,

Vergara-Diaz G, Haig AJ. Rehabilitation in Africa. Phys Med

RehabilClin N Am. 2019 Nov;30(4):757-768. doi:

1016/j.pmr.2019.07.002.

Dhakal R, Groves CC. Rehabilitation in Nepal. Phys Med

RehabilClin N Am. 2019 Nov;30(4):787-794. doi:

1016/j.pmr.2019.07.004.

Uddin T, Khasru MR, Islam MT, Shakoor MA,Emran MA,

Sakel M. COVID-19 pandemic, challenges, and opportunities

for neurorehabilitation in Bangladesh: A narrative review. J

Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med 2021;4:107-12

Rathore FA, Butt AW, Soomro N, Akhtar N. A QuestionnaireBased Survey of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Residency Training in Pakistan. Cureus. 2017 Jan 31;9(1):

e1005. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1005.

Mercuri E, Finkel R, Scoto M, Hall S, Eaton S, Rashid A,

Balashkina J, Coratti G, Pera MC, Samsuddin S, Civitello M,

Muntoni F; iSMAC Group. Development of an academic

disease registry for spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul

Disord. 2019 Oct;29(10):794-799. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd. 2019.

014.

Walker KL, Rodrigues MJ, Watson B, Reilly C, Scotter EL,

Brunton H, Turnbull J, Roxburgh RH. Establishment and 12-

month progress of the New Zealand Motor Neurone Disease

Registry. J ClinNeurosci. 2019 Feb;60:7-11. doi: 10.1016/

j.jocn.2018.11.034.

Sarfo FS, Ulasavets U, Opare-Sem OK, Ovbiagele B. TeleRehabilitation after Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review

of the Literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018

Sep;27(9):2306-2318. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.

05.013.

Truijen S, Abdullahi A, Bijsterbosch D, van Zoest E, Conijn

M, Wang Y, Struyf N, Saeys W. Effect of home-based virtual

reality training and telerehabilitation on balance in individuals

with Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, and stroke: a

systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2022

May;43(5):2995-3006. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05855-2.

León-Salas B, González-Hernández Y, Infante-Ventura D, de

Armas-Castellano A, García-García J, García-Hernández M,

Carmona-Rodríguez M, Olazarán J, Dobato JL, RodríguezRodríguez L, Trujillo-Martín MM. Telemedicine for

neurological diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jan;30(1):241-254. doi: 10.1111/ene.15599.

Al Imam MH, Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F,

Chhetri AB, Smithers-Sheedy H, McIntyre S, Badawi N,

Khandaker G. Predictors of Rehabilitation Service Utilisation

among Children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) in Low- and MiddleIncome Countries (LMIC): Findings from the Global LMIC

CP Register. Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 25;11(7):848. doi:

3390/brainsci11070848.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-25

How to Cite

Hassan, Z. ., Rathore, F. A. ., & Mangat, S. . (2024). Current Status of Neurorehabilitation Services in the OIC Countries: Results of an International Online Survey. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 14(02), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2023307

Issue

Section

Original Articles