Responsiveness Of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) And Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) In Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Undergoing Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery Versus Women With No Surgery

Authors

  • Naila Mehboob
  • Asma Rauf
  • Ghana Shahid
  • Tehreem Sultana
  • Ghazala Mahmud

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2018004

Keywords:

Prolapse, PFDI, PFIQ, POPIQ, UDI, CRADI, POPDI, UIQ, CRAIQ

Abstract

Objective: To determine the responsiveness of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact
Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women with pelvic organ prolapse, undergoing vaginal reconstructive surgery versus women
with no surgery.
Methodology: This study was a cross sectional comparative study carried out in the department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, Pakistan Air Force Hospital, Mianwali in a period from January 2011 to December 2015. Prolapsed women
with stage II or more and with willingness for surgery were included in the surgery group. Those willing for conservative
management (pelvic floor exercises) were included in the non-surgical group. All patients in both groups completed
the PFDI and PFIQ at baseline and 6 month follow-up.
Results: Mean (±SD) age, weight, and parity of the patients were 51.42 (±9.07) years, 58.60 (±6.8) kg and 4.00 (±2.14)
respectively. More than half of the patients (61%) belonged to low socio economic status, followed by middle class
34% and upper class 5%. Majority of the patients (61%) were post-menopausal. Most of the patients (72%) had stage
II prolapse, followed by stage III (27%) and stage IV (1%). 
Conclusion: The PFDI and PFIQ both are responsive to change in women undergoing surgical and non-surgical
treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. But PFDI and PFIQ are more responsive to change in the surgical group. It was
also concluded that PFDI is more responsive than the PFIQ in women with pelvic organ relapse

References

Dangal G. A study of reproductive morbidity of women in

the Eastern Terai Region of Nepal. Nepal J Obstet Gynecol.

;3(1):29-34.

Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V.

The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity tosymptoms

and quality of life. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;112(7):971-

Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH,

Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse

surgery in the United States. Obstetrics and gynecology.

;98(4):646-51.

Hameed N, Ali MA. Case series tension-free vaginal tape

and female stress urinary incontinence. Our initial

experience in Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad.

;18(2).

Ansar H, Adil F, Munir AA. Unreported Urinary and anal

incontinence in women. JLUMHS. 2005.

Nilsson CG, Falconer C, Rezapour M. Seven-year follow-up

of tension- free vaginal Tape procedure for treatment of

urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:1259-62.

deTayrac R, Deffieux X, Droupy S, Chauveaud-Lambling A,

Calvanese-Benamour L, Fernandez H. A prospective

randomized trial comparing tension- free vaginal tape and

transobturator suburethral tape for surgical treatment of

stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004;

: 602-608.

Heit M, Rosenquist C, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M,

Shotts S. Predicting treatment choice for patients with

pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol, 2003; 101: 1279–84.

Zimmermann CW. Surgical correction of defects in pelvic

support (Pelvic organ prolapse). In: Rock JA, Jones HW III

(edi). Te Linde’s Operative Gynecology, 9th edn. Philadelphia:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003; 927- 948.

Olsen AL, Smith VG, Bergstrom JO. Epidemiology of

surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary

incontinence. Obstet Gynecol, 1997; 89: 501- 506.

Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S.

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18: CD004014.

Barber MD, Walters MD, Cundiff GW, Group PT. Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and

Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1492-8.

Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Courtese

M. Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and

posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG

; 112: 107- 111.

deTayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A,

Fernandez H. Long-term anatomical and functional

assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tensionfree polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2005; 17: 1- 6.

Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese

M. Functional and Anatomical outcome of anterior and

posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG,

; 112: 107-111.

Shah DK, Paul EM, Rastinehad AR, Eisenberg ER, Badlani

GH. Short-term outcome analysis of total pelvic reconstruction

with mesh; the vaginal approach. J Urol 2004; 171: 261-

Barranger E, Fritel X, Pigne A. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy

in young women with Uterovaginal prolapse: a long-term

follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1245-50.

Barber MD, Neubauer NL, Klein-Olarte V. Can we screen for

pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in

epidemiologic studies? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):

-8. Epub 2006 May 8.

Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patientcentered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is

success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol.

;187(1):88-92.

Kapoor DS, Davila GW, Rosenthal RJ, Ghoniem GM. Pelvic

floor dysfunction in morbidly obese women: pilot study.

Obes Res. 2004;12(7):1104-7.

Vimplis S, Hooper P. Assessment and management of

pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Obstet Gynecol 2005; 15, 387-

Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC.

Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive conditionspecific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic

floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1388-

Wren PA, Janz NK, Brubaker L, Fitzgerald MP, Weber AM,

LaPorte FB, et al. Reliability of health-related quality-oflife measures 1 year after surgical procedures for pelvic

floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):780-8.

Geller EJ, Barbee ER, Wu JM, Loomis MJ, Visco AG. Validation

of telephone administration of 2 condition-specific qualityof-life questionnaires. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6)

:632 e1-4.

Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two

condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women

with pelvic floor disorders. (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J

Obstet Gynecol, 2005; 193: 103-113

Downloads

Published

2021-11-29

How to Cite

Mehboob, N. ., Rauf, A. ., Shahid, G. ., Sultana, T. ., & Mahmud, G. . (2021). Responsiveness Of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) And Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) In Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Undergoing Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery Versus Women With No Surgery. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 8(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2018004

Issue

Section

Original Articles