Ultrasound Employed to Detect Breast Lumps among Symptomatic Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2020032Keywords:
Breast Ultrasound, Breast FNAC/Biopsy, Breast lump, Nipple DischargeAbstract
Objective: To assess different pathological breast lesions in ultra sound in a subgroup of population.
Study design and setting: It was a cross sectional study conducted at Bolan Medical Complex Hospital Quetta, Pakistan
from June 2018 to January 2019.
Methodology: Total 103 patients with breast swelling, pain and discharge were targeted. Gray scale and Doppler Ultrasound
of breast followed by FNAC/biopsy of breast lesion was performed. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation for
continuous variables and frequency with percentages for categorical variables.
Results: Out of 48 clinically palpable lumps US detected all of 48 lumps and additionally 12 clinically non palpable masses
were detected on US examination. Thus, overall sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting breast lumps was 100%. Fibroadenoma
of the breast was diagnosed accurately in 80.3% of women. Ultrasound reliably differentiated cystic from solid breast
masses (100%). The sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting breast carcinoma was 63.4% with a positive predictive value
of 87.5%, a negative predictive value of 99.5% and accuracy of 58.33%. US findings most suggestive of benign lesions
were oval or round shape in 88.3%, well defined margin in 84%, absent lobulation in 86.04% and wider than taller ratio
in 90.69% of the cases.US findings of most predictive for malignancy were of irregular shape in 81.8%, ill-defined margin
in 90.9% and length to height ratio in 63.6% of cases.
Conclusion: Ultrasound is simple, cheap, safe and relatively accessible imaging modality for evaluation of breast pathologies.
Due to its high sensitivity in diagnosing benign breast lesions particularly cystic lesions and fibroadenoma unnecessary
interventions can be avoided.
References
Pisano ED. Ultrasound as the primary screening test for breast cancer: analysis from ACRIN 6666. Journal of the National
Cancer Institute. 2016;108(4):djv367.
Gonzaga MA. How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses?. Pan African Medical Journal.
;7(1).
Okello J, Kisembo H, Bugeza S, Galukande M. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically
dense breasts. BMC medical imaging. 2014;14(1):41.
E.J. Kantelhardt1, P. Zerche1, A. Mathewos3, P. Trocchi2, A. Addissie4, A. Aynalem3, T. Wondemagegnehu3, T. Ersumo5,
and B.Y. A. Reeler6, M. Tinsae7, T. Gemechu7, A. Jemal8,
C. Thomssen1, A. Stang3,9 and S. Bogale, Breast cancer survival in Ethiopia. International Journal of Cancer, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28691
Regina J. Hooley, M., M. Leslie M. Scoutt, and M. Liane E. Philpotts, Breast Ultrasonography: State of the Art1. RSNA,
268.
Evans A, Trimboli RM, Athanasiou A, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Herrero JC, Clauser P, Colin C, Cornford E,
Fallenberg EM. Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European
Society of Breast Imaging. Insights into imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):449-61.
European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2014) Renewal of radiological equipment. Insights Imaging 5:543–546
Vourtsis A, Kachulis A (2018) The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS
characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 28:592–601 Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland
R, Stoeblen F (2015) Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of
mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol 2015;56:404–412
Meng Z, Chen C, Zhu Yet al (2015) Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review
of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant
breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2015;25:3638–47
Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SWet al (2015) Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with threedimensional
automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight study. Radiology. 2015;274:663–73
Zhou, Y., Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 2013;3(2):1-14
Brem1, R.F., et al., Screening Breast Ultrasound: Past, Present, and Future. AJR, 2014. 204: p. 234-240.
Pan, H.-B., The Role of Breast Ultrasound in Early Cancer Detection. Journal of Medical Ultrasound, 2016. 24: p. 138-
Yasmin Davoudi 1*, B.B., Masoud Pezeshki Rad 2, and N. Matin, The role of Doppler Sonography in Distinguishing
Malignant from Benign Breast Lesions. journal of Medical Ultrasound, 2014;22(2):92-5.
Yumjaobabu Singh Takhellambam1, S.S.L., Opendro Singh Sapam3, and B.S.N. Raju Singh Kshetrimayum4, Tousif
Khan6, Comparison of Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Malignant Breast
Lesions. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research., 2013 7(12): p. 2847-2850.
Rounak Kalwani , K.K., Sonam S Daftari, Comparsion of ultrasonogaphy and fine needle aspiration cytology in the
diagnosis of malignant breast lesions in a rural setup. IJRSMS.
Mubuuke AG. How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses? Pan-African Medical Journal.
;7:1. DOI: 10.4314/pamj.v7i1.69094
Kailash et al. The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. JK Science. 2008; 10(4):186-8
Shukla HS, Kumar S. Benign breast diseases in non western population part II: Benign breast disorders in India. World J
Surg 1989; 13:746-9.
Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to
distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995; 196:123–134.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ameet Jesrani, Pari Gul, Nida Amin Khan, Seema Nayab, Fahmida Naheed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bahria University Medical & Dental College is an open access journal and is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0