Ultrasound Employed to Detect Breast Lumps among Symptomatic Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Ameet Jesrani
  • Pari Gul
  • Nida Amin Khan
  • Seema Nayab
  • Fahmida Naheed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2020032

Keywords:

Breast Ultrasound, Breast FNAC/Biopsy, Breast lump, Nipple Discharge

Abstract

Objective: To assess different pathological breast lesions in ultra sound in a subgroup of population.
Study design and setting: It was a cross sectional study conducted at Bolan Medical Complex Hospital Quetta, Pakistan
from June 2018 to January 2019.
Methodology: Total 103 patients with breast swelling, pain and discharge were targeted. Gray scale and Doppler Ultrasound
of breast followed by FNAC/biopsy of breast lesion was performed. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation for
continuous variables and frequency with percentages for categorical variables.
Results: Out of 48 clinically palpable lumps US detected all of 48 lumps and additionally 12 clinically non palpable masses
were detected on US examination. Thus, overall sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting breast lumps was 100%. Fibroadenoma
of the breast was diagnosed accurately in 80.3% of women. Ultrasound reliably differentiated cystic from solid breast
masses (100%). The sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting breast carcinoma was 63.4% with a positive predictive value
of 87.5%, a negative predictive value of 99.5% and accuracy of 58.33%. US findings most suggestive of benign lesions
were oval or round shape in 88.3%, well defined margin in 84%, absent lobulation in 86.04% and wider than taller ratio
in 90.69% of the cases.US findings of most predictive for malignancy were of irregular shape in 81.8%, ill-defined margin
in 90.9% and length to height ratio in 63.6% of cases.
Conclusion: Ultrasound is simple, cheap, safe and relatively accessible imaging modality for evaluation of breast pathologies.
Due to its high sensitivity in diagnosing benign breast lesions particularly cystic lesions and fibroadenoma unnecessary
interventions can be avoided.

References

Pisano ED. Ultrasound as the primary screening test for breast cancer: analysis from ACRIN 6666. Journal of the National

Cancer Institute. 2016;108(4):djv367.

Gonzaga MA. How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses?. Pan African Medical Journal.

;7(1).

Okello J, Kisembo H, Bugeza S, Galukande M. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically

dense breasts. BMC medical imaging. 2014;14(1):41.

E.J. Kantelhardt1, P. Zerche1, A. Mathewos3, P. Trocchi2, A. Addissie4, A. Aynalem3, T. Wondemagegnehu3, T. Ersumo5,

and B.Y. A. Reeler6, M. Tinsae7, T. Gemechu7, A. Jemal8,

C. Thomssen1, A. Stang3,9 and S. Bogale, Breast cancer survival in Ethiopia. International Journal of Cancer, 2013.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28691

Regina J. Hooley, M., M. Leslie M. Scoutt, and M. Liane E. Philpotts, Breast Ultrasonography: State of the Art1. RSNA,

268.

Evans A, Trimboli RM, Athanasiou A, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Herrero JC, Clauser P, Colin C, Cornford E,

Fallenberg EM. Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European

Society of Breast Imaging. Insights into imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):449-61.

European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2014) Renewal of radiological equipment. Insights Imaging 5:543–546

Vourtsis A, Kachulis A (2018) The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS

characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 28:592–601 Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland

R, Stoeblen F (2015) Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of

mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol 2015;56:404–412

Meng Z, Chen C, Zhu Yet al (2015) Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review

of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant

breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2015;25:3638–47

Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SWet al (2015) Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with threedimensional

automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight study. Radiology. 2015;274:663–73

Zhou, Y., Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 2013;3(2):1-14

Brem1, R.F., et al., Screening Breast Ultrasound: Past, Present, and Future. AJR, 2014. 204: p. 234-240.

Pan, H.-B., The Role of Breast Ultrasound in Early Cancer Detection. Journal of Medical Ultrasound, 2016. 24: p. 138-

Yasmin Davoudi 1*, B.B., Masoud Pezeshki Rad 2, and N. Matin, The role of Doppler Sonography in Distinguishing

Malignant from Benign Breast Lesions. journal of Medical Ultrasound, 2014;22(2):92-5.

Yumjaobabu Singh Takhellambam1, S.S.L., Opendro Singh Sapam3, and B.S.N. Raju Singh Kshetrimayum4, Tousif

Khan6, Comparison of Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Malignant Breast

Lesions. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research., 2013 7(12): p. 2847-2850.

Rounak Kalwani , K.K., Sonam S Daftari, Comparsion of ultrasonogaphy and fine needle aspiration cytology in the

diagnosis of malignant breast lesions in a rural setup. IJRSMS.

Mubuuke AG. How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses? Pan-African Medical Journal.

;7:1. DOI: 10.4314/pamj.v7i1.69094

Kailash et al. The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. JK Science. 2008; 10(4):186-8

Shukla HS, Kumar S. Benign breast diseases in non western population part II: Benign breast disorders in India. World J

Surg 1989; 13:746-9.

Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to

distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995; 196:123–134.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-18

How to Cite

Jesrani, A., Gul, P. ., Khan, N. A. ., Nayab, S., & Naheed, F. . (2021). Ultrasound Employed to Detect Breast Lumps among Symptomatic Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 10(4), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2020032

Issue

Section

Original Articles