Sensitivity and Specificity of the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Diagnosing Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis in NICU Patients

Authors

  • Zunaira Zulfiqar
  • Unaiza Syed
  • Syed Arsalan Hassan
  • Nabeera Hayat
  • Hamza Khursheed
  • Abu Bakar Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2024408

Keywords:

Lymphocyte ratio, neonatal, neutrophil, sepsis

Abstract

Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in diagnosing late onset neonatal sepsis in NICU patients at a tertiary care center

Study Design and Setting: Prospective observational study at Department of Pediatrics, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore from February 2024-July 2024

Methodology: After admission into the NICU for suspected late onset neonatal sepsis, complete blood count, C-reactive protein and blood cultures were sent before changing or starting broad spectrum anti-biotic therapy for 350 patients included in the study. Primary variables observed were sensitivity and specificity of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in diagnosing late onset sepsis once co-related with the culture results.

Results: Blood panel parameters showed mean absolute neutrophil count to be 5928.19796.05/mm3versus 7032.80166.02/mm3 between the suspected and confirmed patients’ groups (p<0.001). Similarly, mean absolute lymphocyte count was 2745.32394.53/mm3 versus 3223.60278.90/mm3 between both groups (p<0.001). Median value for NLR was 1.70 (1.00) versus 2.20 (1.00) between the suspected and confirmed culture groups (p<0.001). Assessment of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for NLR when compared with suspected and confirmed sepsis showed area under the curve being 0.644 (CI=95%) with sensitivity of 74.6%, specificity of 55.6%, positive predictive value being 57.3% and negative predictive value being 73.3% with a cut-off value for NLR being 2.05.

Conclusion: We conclude that neutrophil lymphocyte ratio with a cut-off value of 2.05 is a reliable method to diagnose late onset neonatal sepsis with good sensitivity

References

1. Fleischmann C, Reichert F, Cassini A, Horner R, Harder T,

Markwart R, et al. Global incidence and mortality of neonatal

sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of

Disease in Childhood. 2021;106(8):745-52. https://doi.org/

10.1136/archdischild-2020-320217

2. Odabasi IO, Bulbul A. Neonatal sepsis. ªiºli Etfal Hastanesi

Tip Bülteni. 2020;54(2):142-58. DOI: 10.14744/ SEMB.2020.

00236

3. Wen SC, Ezure Y, Rolley L, Spurling G, Lau CL, Riaz S, et

al. Gram-negative neonatal sepsis in low-and lower-middleincome countries and WHO empirical antibiotic

recommendations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS medicine. 2021;18(9):e1003787.

4. Hayes R, Hartnett J, Semova G, Murray C, Murphy K, Carroll

L, et al. Neonatal sepsis definitions from randomised clinical

trials. Pediatric Research. 2023;93(5):1141-8. https://doi.org/

10.1038/s41390-021-01749-3

5. Rafi MA, Miah MMZ, Wadood MA, Hossain MG. Risk factors

and etiology of neonatal sepsis after hospital delivery: a casecontrol study in a tertiary care hospital of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

PloS one. 2020;15(11):e0242275. https://doi.org/10.1371

/journal.pone.0242275

6. Köstlin-Gille N, Härtel C, Haug C, Göpel W, Zemlin M,

Müller A, et al. Epidemiology of early and late onset neonatal

sepsis in very low birthweight infants: data from the German

Neonatal Network. The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

2021;40(3):255-9. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002976

7. Glaser MA, Hughes LM, Jnah A, Newberry D, Harris-Haman

PA. Neonatal sepsis: a review of pathophysiology and current

management strategies. Advances in neonatal care.

2021;21(1):49-60. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000769

8. Srinivasan L, Balasubramanian H, Stewart MT, Weiss EM,

Kirpalani H, Cooper C, et al. Procalcitonin for the diagnosis

of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review. The

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023;2023(4).

https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD014196

9. Li T, Dong G, Zhang M, Xu Z, Hu Y, Xie B, et al. Association

of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and the presence of neonatal

sepsis. Journal of immunology research. 2020;2020.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7650713

10. Ahmed M, Yasrab M, Khushdil A, Qamar K, Ahmed Z.

Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care hospital: bacteriological

profile and its antibicrobial sensitivity. Pakistan armed forces

medical journal. 2018;68(6):1654-58.

11. Haque KN. Definitions of bloodstream infection in the

newborn. Pediatric Critical care medicine. 2005;6(3):S45-S9.

DOI: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161946.73305.0A

12. Mukhopadhyay S, Puopolo KM, Hansen NI, Lorch SA,

DeMauro SB, Greenberg RG, et al. Neurodevelopmental

outcomes following neonatal late-onset sepsis and blood

culture-negative conditions. Archives of Disease in ChildhoodFetal and Neonatal Edition. 2021;106(5):467-73.

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-320664

13. Pan T, Zhu Q, Li P, Hua J, Feng X. Late-onset neonatal sepsis

in Suzhou, China. BMC pediatrics. 2020;20:1-7. https:

//doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02103-y

14. Sumitro KR, Utomo MT, Widodo ADW. Neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio as an alternative marker of neonatal sepsis

in developing countries. Oman Medical Journal.

2021;36(1):e214. https://doi.org/10.5001%2Fomj.2021.05

15. Bai L, Gong P, Jia X, Zhang X, Li X, Zhang Y, et al.

Comparison of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and plateletto-lymphocyte ratio for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: A

systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC pediatrics.

2023;23(1):334. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04094-

y

16. Varal IG, Dogan P. Can neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio be a

predictor of late-onset sepsis in preterm infants? 2020.

17. Naseer N, Sheikh TK, Zulfiqar S, Bashir H, Haroon S, Jahangir

J. Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio as Screening Tool for Neonatal

Sepsis in Developing Countries. Pakistan Armed Forces

Medical Journal. 2023;73(2):583-86. https://doi.org/10.51253/

pafmj.v73i2.8450

18. AL Nady N, Ismaiel Y, Assar E, Saleh M. Diagnostic Value

of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio on Neonatal Sepsis in

Full Term and Preterm Neonates. Benha Journal of Applied

Sciences. 2021;6(6):169-77.

19. Zhao G, Chen J, Wang J, Wang S, Xia J, Wei Y, et al. Predictive

values of the postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,

platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte

ratio for the diagnosis of early periprosthetic joint infections:

a preliminary study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Research. 2020;15:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-

02107-5

20. Chen C, Yang H, Cai D, Xiang L, Fang W, Wang R.

Preoperative peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios

(NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) related

nomograms predict the survival of patients with limited-stage

small-cell lung cancer. Translational lung cancer research.

2021;10(2):866. https://doi.org/10.21037%2Ftlcr-20-997

Downloads

Published

2025-01-07

How to Cite

Zulfiqar, Z., Syed, U., Hassan, S. A., Hayat, N., Khursheed, H., & Khan, A. B. (2025). Sensitivity and Specificity of the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Diagnosing Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis in NICU Patients. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 15(01), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2024408

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/u735751794/domains/bahria.edu.pk/public_html/ojs_jbumdc/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49