Immediate Post-Placental Insertion versus Interval Insertion of Intrauterine Devices for Contraception

Rozina Mustafa
Haniyah Qamar
Khalida Nasreen
Issue Details
Journal ID 1
Volume 5
Number 2
Year 2015
Issue Date 2015-06-04 00:00:00
DOI
Copyright Holder Rozina Mustafa, Haniyah Qamar, Khalida Nasreen
Copyright Year 2015
Keywords:
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the frequency of uterine perforation, expulsion and pelvic infection rate of multiload 375 in women
of immediate post-placental (IPP) insertion versus interval insertion (I).
Materials and Methods: This Quasi-experimental study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, PNS
SHIFA Hospital Karachi from 6th October 2008 to 5th October 2009. Fifty patients were selected by consecutive sampling
technique for Group A (immediate post-placental insertion of multiload 375). Fifty women for group B (interval insertion of
multiload 375) were selected by simple random sampling during their postnatal follow-up visit. Post- insertion follow up visit
was done within six weeks. The results were analyzed by SPSS version 12 and expressed in frequencies and percentages.
Pearson’s Chi-square test was used as the test of significance.
Results: Mean age of women in group A was 29.02 ± 2.97 and in group B it was 31.24 ± 5.59 years. Multiparous women opted
for IUD in both groups (48% in group A versus 44% in group B). IUD expulsion was 14% & 18% in group A & B respectively.
While infection rate was 4% in group A and 2% in group B. Statistically non significant (P>0.05) results were found. No case
of uterine perforation was noted in both the groups.
Conclusion: Although both methods have almost same complication rate but for non compliant women IPP insertion of an
IUD is a convenient selection for contraception.
Keywords: Intrauterine device (IUD), Immediate

Published: 2015-06-04

Last Modified: 2022-04-26 23:05:55